Hi all, As for the current discussion on adopting a "current practices and gap analysis" document, I express my support to [1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-03. It seems to me that it is a better base document for the group.
Cheers, Rui Costa |-----Original Message----- |From: dmm-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of |Jouni Korhonen |Sent: jueves, 03 de enero de 2013 13:05 |To: dmm@ietf.org |Cc: Julien Laganier |Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap |analysis" document | | |Folks, | |Just a reminder that ~one more week time to voice your preference! | |- Jouni | | |On Dec 20, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Jouni Korhonen <jouni...@gmail.com> wrote: | |> |> On Dec 20, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano |<c...@it.uc3m.es> wrote: |> |>> Dear chairs, |>> |>> We have been working on an update of draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis, |>> addressing the comments received on the mailing list and during the |>> last meeting. Main changes from -02 are: |>> |>> - New section on 3GPP mobility. |>> - New section on functional analysis. |>> - New section on combined solution analysis. |>> - Several fixes and clean-ups. |>> |>> We'd like to ask the chairs to replace [1] below with the new |>> revision (draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-03), that we have just |submitted. |> |> |> This is OK. Consider -03 as the document [1] for the adoption call. |> |> - Jouni & Julien. |> |> |> |> |>> |>> Thanks! |>> |>> Carlos |>> |>> On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 22:25 +0200, Jouni Korhonen wrote: |>>> Folks, |>>> |>>> We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologies |for that. The next step is to select a "current practices and gap |analysis" document to serve as the basis for the future WG document. We |consider two documents on this topic to choose from: |>>> |>>> [1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02 [2] |>>> draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 |>>> |>>> and we as a WG need to decide which one is going to form the |>>> _basis_ |for the WG document. |>>> |>>> Please voice your preference either for [1] or for [2] on the |mailing list. We would appreciate if you can also provide a one-liner |justification for your selection. The chairs will determine if there is |(rough) consensus from active WG participants to proceed with selecting |one document against the other. |>>> |>>> The call starts today 19th Dec 2012 and ends by 10th Jan 2013. We |have a longer three week call now due the holiday season in between. |>>> |>>> - Jouni & Julien |>>> _______________________________________________ |>>> dmm mailing list |>>> dmm@ietf.org |>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm |>> |>> |>> _______________________________________________ |>> dmm mailing list |>> dmm@ietf.org |>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm |> | |_______________________________________________ |dmm mailing list |dmm@ietf.org |https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
