Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01
Hi Perrick, Default values of other configuration variables are now defined in revision 02. -- Thanks, Dhananjay -Original Message- From: dmm <dmm-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgund...@cisco.com> Date: Wednesday, 8 June 2016 at 7:41 PM To: "pierrick.se...@orange.com" <pierrick.se...@orange.com>, "jouni.nos...@gmail.com" <jouni.nos...@gmail.com>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>, 成 鹏 <max@alibaba-inc.com> Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01 >Thanks Pierrick. We can define the default values along with the range for >each variable. > >Regards >Sri > > >On 6/8/16, 2:07 AM, "dmm on behalf of pierrick.se...@orange.com" ><dmm-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of pierrick.se...@orange.com> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I have read this I-D and I think it is ready to move forward. >> >>The only commen I have is that all configuration variables (section 4.1) >>have default value, except for LCMPReregistrationStartTime and >>LCMPInitialRetransmissionTime >> >>Pierrick >> >>> -----Message d'origine----- >>> De : dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Jouni Korhonen >>> Envoyé : mardi 7 juin 2016 19:14 >>> À : dmm@ietf.org; Jouni; 成 鹏 >>> Objet : [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01 >>> >>> Folks, >>> >>> This email starts the WGLC #2 for >>> draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01. Post your comment to the >>>mailing >>> list and also add your issues/correction requests/concerns etc into the >>>Issue >>> Tracker. >>> >>> WGLC #2 Starts: 6/7/2016 >>> WGLC #2 Ends: 6/21/2016 EOB PDT >>> >>> Regards, >>> Jouni & Dapeng >>> >>> ___ >>> dmm mailing list >>> dmm@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >> >>__ >>___ >> >>Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations >>confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc >>pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez >>recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler >>a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages >>electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, >>Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme >>ou falsifie. Merci. >> >>This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged >>information that may be protected by law; >>they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >>If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and >>delete this message and its attachments. >>As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have >>been modified, changed or falsified. >>Thank you. >> >>___ >>dmm mailing list >>dmm@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > >___ >dmm mailing list >dmm@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01
Hi Siel, Please see inline. -- Regards, Dhananjay -Original Message- From: dmm <dmm-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Seil Jeon <seilj...@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday, 21 June 2016 at 2:38 PM To: "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org> Cc: '成 鹏' <max@alibaba-inc.com>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01 >Hi, > >I have read this draft and some questions come to my mind. Let me know my >understanding is correct or not first. > >Actually, this draft comes to a proposed container option to be delivered by >a PBA message, enabling the LMA to put various parameters related to the MAG >enforcement, not doing it individually for less signaling overhead(?) [Dhananjay] By ‘doing it individually’ do you mean separate options (instead of sub-options) for Binding Update Control and Heartbeat Control? The idea is to keep all such LMA controlled parameters grouped into a single container option. > >And when I saw following sentence > >"Configuring aggressive values of parameters such as re-registration timeout >and heartbeat interval can potentially create considerable signaling load on >the LMA." > >I was expecting you would take care of it in terms of efficient transmission >perspective as well. Is it out-of-scope, right? [Dhananjay] This extension is only to communicate the values enforced by the LMA to the MAG. Tuning of the value for efficient transmission is out of scope of this extension. The above sentence is only to state a caution which is applicable even without using this extension. > > > >Two minor typos are, > >In Introduction, aggresive -> aggressive > >in 5.2, reveived -> received(?) [Dhananjay] Thanks for pointing these out. I am correcting these in the next version. Regards, Dhananjay > > >Regards, >Seil Jeon > > > >-Original Message----- >From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen >Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 2:14 AM >To: dmm@ietf.org; Jouni; 成 鹏 >Subject: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01 > >Folks, > >This email starts the WGLC #2 for >draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01. Post your comment to the >mailing list and also add your issues/correction requests/concerns etc into >the Issue Tracker. > > WGLC #2 Starts: 6/7/2016 > WGLC #2 Ends: 6/21/2016 EOB PDT > >Regards, > Jouni & Dapeng > >___ >dmm mailing list >dmm@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > >___ >dmm mailing list >dmm@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01
Hi Yan, 1) in the Introduction Section, "have tens of thousands of MAGs" is too specific here to describe the scenario. [Dhananjay] This extension becomes necessary when there is a large scale of MAGs and the above wording is only to realize that. But of course, it can be used even at smaller scale. 2) this extension focuses on Refresh and Heartbeat control, is it necessary to leave space for additional use cases? [Dhananjay] Space of additional use cases is left for extensibility of the option. -- Regards, Dhananjay From: dmm <dmm-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of "Z.W. Yan" <y...@cnnic.cn<mailto:y...@cnnic.cn>> Date: Sunday, 12 June 2016 at 6:42 AM To: "jouni.nospam" <jouni.nos...@gmail.com<mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com>>, "dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org>" <dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org>>, "jouni.nospam" <jouni.nos...@gmail.com<mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com>>, 成 鹏 <max@alibaba-inc.com<mailto:max@alibaba-inc.com>> Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01 Hi, all, This draft reads good and I support it to be moved forward. Two comments are : 1) in the Introduction Section, "have tens of thousands of MAGs" is too specific here to describe the scenario. 2) this extension focuses on Refresh and Heartbeat control, is it necessary to leave space for additional use cases? BR, 2016-06-12 Z.W. Yan ________________ 发件人： Jouni Korhonen 发送时间： 2016-06-08 01:13:58 收件人： dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org>; Jouni; 成 鹏 抄送： 主题： [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01 Folks, This email starts the WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01. Post your comment to the mailing list and also add your issues/correction requests/concerns etc into the Issue Tracker. WGLC #2 Starts: 6/7/2016 WGLC #2 Ends: 6/21/2016 EOB PDT Regards, Jouni & Dapeng ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01
Hi, I have read this draft and some questions come to my mind. Let me know my understanding is correct or not first. Actually, this draft comes to a proposed container option to be delivered by a PBA message, enabling the LMA to put various parameters related to the MAG enforcement, not doing it individually for less signaling overhead(?) And when I saw following sentence "Configuring aggressive values of parameters such as re-registration timeout and heartbeat interval can potentially create considerable signaling load on the LMA." I was expecting you would take care of it in terms of efficient transmission perspective as well. Is it out-of-scope, right? Two minor typos are, In Introduction, aggresive -> aggressive in 5.2, reveived -> received(?) Regards, Seil Jeon -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 2:14 AM To: dmm@ietf.org; Jouni; 成 鹏 Subject: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01 Folks, This email starts the WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01. Post your comment to the mailing list and also add your issues/correction requests/concerns etc into the Issue Tracker. WGLC #2 Starts: 6/7/2016 WGLC #2 Ends: 6/21/2016 EOB PDT Regards, Jouni & Dapeng ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01
Thanks Pierrick. We can define the default values along with the range for each variable. Regards Sri On 6/8/16, 2:07 AM, "dmm on behalf of pierrick.se...@orange.com" <dmm-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of pierrick.se...@orange.com> wrote: >Hi, > >I have read this I-D and I think it is ready to move forward. > >The only commen I have is that all configuration variables (section 4.1) >have default value, except for LCMPReregistrationStartTime and >LCMPInitialRetransmissionTime > >Pierrick > >> -Message d'origine- >> De : dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Jouni Korhonen >> Envoyé : mardi 7 juin 2016 19:14 >> À : dmm@ietf.org; Jouni; 成 鹏 >> Objet : [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01 >> >> Folks, >> >> This email starts the WGLC #2 for >> draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01. Post your comment to the >>mailing >> list and also add your issues/correction requests/concerns etc into the >>Issue >> Tracker. >> >> WGLC #2 Starts: 6/7/2016 >> WGLC #2 Ends: 6/21/2016 EOB PDT >> >> Regards, >> Jouni & Dapeng >> >> ___ >> dmm mailing list >> dmm@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > >__ >___ > >Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations >confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc >pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez >recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler >a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages >electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, >Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme >ou falsifie. Merci. > >This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged >information that may be protected by law; >they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and >delete this message and its attachments. >As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have >been modified, changed or falsified. >Thank you. > >___ >dmm mailing list >dmm@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
Re: [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01
Hi, I have read this I-D and I think it is ready to move forward. The only commen I have is that all configuration variables (section 4.1) have default value, except for LCMPReregistrationStartTime and LCMPInitialRetransmissionTime Pierrick > -Message d'origine- > De : dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Jouni Korhonen > Envoyé : mardi 7 juin 2016 19:14 > À : dmm@ietf.org; Jouni; 成 鹏 > Objet : [DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01 > > Folks, > > This email starts the WGLC #2 for > draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01. Post your comment to the mailing > list and also add your issues/correction requests/concerns etc into the Issue > Tracker. > > WGLC #2 Starts: 6/7/2016 > WGLC #2 Ends: 6/21/2016 EOB PDT > > Regards, > Jouni & Dapeng > > ___ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
[DMM] WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01
Folks, This email starts the WGLC #2 for draft-ietf-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-01. Post your comment to the mailing list and also add your issues/correction requests/concerns etc into the Issue Tracker. WGLC #2 Starts: 6/7/2016 WGLC #2 Ends: 6/21/2016 EOB PDT Regards, Jouni & Dapeng ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
