> Actually no, because it is assumed that the prefix of B’ could be a SID
for End.GTP4.E instantiated in SRGW. But you’re correct the B’ doesn’t need
to be filled with arg.mob.session.
So the assumption here is that both T.M.GTP4.D and End.M.GTP4.E are
instantiated on the same SRGW.
If that's
Thanks Kentaro for you prompt review prior to my announce. :-)
> Thank you for updating the draft. Nice to see T.M.Tmap was renamed to
> T.M.GTP4.D corresponding to End.M.GTP4.E. :)
It helps to improve consistency of the draft, thanks.
> Some feedback about the updated description.
>
> > 6.6.
Hi,
Thank you for updating the draft. Nice to see T.M.Tmap was renamed to
T.M.GTP4.D corresponding to End.M.GTP4.E. :)
Some feedback about the updated description.
> 6.6. T.M.GTP4.D
> ...
> The prefix of B’ SHOULD be an End.M.GTP4.E SID with its format
> instantiated at an SR gateway with
