Le 24/04/2015 21:22, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
I am still not convinced.
At home I have LTE.
LTE can be 3G if it is somewhat degraded and 3G is also available, so
no reason for inter technology handoff.
YEs there is reason.
At home one may prefer the cheap 802.11ac instead of 3G. The
Le 23/04/2015 19:11, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 22/04/2015 18:06, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
Hi Alex,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Le
Hi Alex,
-Original Message-
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexandru Petrescu
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 1:27 AM
To: sarik...@ieee.org
Cc: sofiane.imad...@gmail.com; Basavaraj Patil; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption: draft-perkins-dmm
I am still not convinced.
At home I have LTE.
LTE can be 3G if it is somewhat degraded and 3G is also available, so
no reason for inter technology handoff.
I am also concerned on some other MN ids proposed like RFid, what is
the assumption there? Is it that the sensor node will have Mobile IP
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 23/04/2015 19:11, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Alexandru Petrescu
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 22/04/2015 18:06, Behcet Sarikaya a écrit :
Hi Alex,
On
Hello Behcet,
On 4/23/2015 10:11 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
The model of Internet access to the cars for cars currently on market in
Europe is the same - the LTE technology is used, using the IMSI as an
identifier. However, that does not use MN-ID, is only IPv4, is not WiFi and
does not resist
I support the adoption of this draft as a WG document;
I only have an editorial comment - Section 2 makes reference to an EPC
and a few other acronyms. Expanding a few of these out may help some
readers.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Jouni Korhonen jouni.nos...@gmail.com
wrote:
Folks,
[as an individual contributor]
I support the adoption of this document.
- Jouni
4/1/2015, 8:02 AM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
Folks,
This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01
to confirm the aadoption s a DMM WG document. The call ends April 15th
EOB PST.
I support adoption of this I-D
4/1/2015, 8:02 AM, Jouni Korhonen kirjoitti:
Folks,
This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01
to confirm the aadoption s a DMM WG document. The call ends April 15th
EOB PST.
Express your support or opposition to the
I support the adoption of this draft.
--
Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random
Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University
#email: jonghy...@gmail.com
#webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon
On Apr 4, 2015, at 5:38 AM, pierrick.se...@orange.com wrote:
I support the adoption of this draft as a WG document;
There was good amount of discussion on supporting RFID related
identifiers. We need to make sure all of those comments will be addressed
in the subsequent revisions.
Sri
On 4/1/15, 8:02 AM, Jouni Korhonen jouni.nos...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
This emails starts a two week call for the I-D
draft-perkins-dmm-4283mnids-01
to confirm the aadoption s a DMM WG document. The call ends April 15th
EOB PST.
Express your support or opposition to the mailing list. During the
IETF92 meeting we got 7 voices for the adoption so at
12 matches
Mail list logo
