Behcet, thanks for clarifying more clearly. :)
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Behcet Sarikaya sarikaya2...@gmail.comwrote:
-- snip --
Ah, I see what you mean. Yes, I'm sure that RR/RS just only know about
routes, nor whole mobility information exists. When I see a node which
plays
Hi Satoru,
Thanks again.
Please see my replies inline.
Regards,
Behcet
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Satoru Matsushima
satoru.matsush...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Behcet,
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Behcet Sarikaya sarikaya2...@gmail.com
wrote:
-- snip --
Referring to Steps 14
Hi Satoru,
Thanks for your reply.
My further comments are inline.
Regards,
Behcet
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Satoru Matsushima
satoru.matsush...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Behcet,
Sorry for my late response. Let me try to answer to your questions.
Referring to Steps 14 and 15 in Figure 4,
Hi Behcet,
Yes, EPC-E routers should be default router for UEs. If I understand the
background of your question correctly, you think an UE session is moved
from an EPC-E router from another while moving around. It should be true
because the UE sending packets are routed most closest node of the
Hi Satoru,
I have a question about vEPC.
As the UE moves around its default router changes. Which node is the
default router? EPC-E?
Regards,
Behcet
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:07 PM, Satoru Matsushima
satoru.matsush...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Peter
Hi Peter,
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Peter McCann peter.mcc...@huawei.comwrote:
Ryuji,
After viewing your slides from the presentation you did overnight (sorry I
couldn't
be on the call) I went back and re-read the
draft-matushima-stateless-uplane-vepc-02
draft. I am still
Hi, Satoru,
Thanks for the answers - I think I understand better now. Let me
just confirm a few points below...
Satoru Matsushima wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Peter McCann peter.mcc...@huawei.com
wrote:
Ryuji,
After viewing your slides from the
