Re: [DMM] SRv6 for Mobile User-Plane

Hi Pablo, Let me focus on one point. > [...snip...] > > > > > Uplink > > Note: S1, S2 represent service functions and C1 represents a node for > TE purposes > > UE sends its packet (A, Z) on a specific wireless bearer to its gNB > > gNB’s CP associates the session

Re: [DMM] SRv6 for Mobile User-Plane

Hi Satoru, Thank you for your detailed comments. Replies inline [PC]. Cheers, Pablo. On 27/02/2018, 05:46, "Satoru Matsushima" wrote: Pablo, First of all, thank you for your thorough review on the draft, and concrete proposal to improve it.

Re: [DMM] SRv6 for Mobile User-Plane

gt; Cc: satoru.matsush...@g.softbank.co.jp; cf(mailer list) <c...@cisco.com>; > Miya Kohno (mkohno) <mko...@cisco.com>; dmm@ietf.org; Voyer, Daniel > <daniel.vo...@bell.ca> > Subject: Re: [DMM] SRv6 for Mobile User-Plane > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:05 PM, P

Re: [DMM] SRv6 for Mobile User-Plane

Sorry, replied to the wrong message. This was regarding the SRH insertion topic.. On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 3:51 PM, Miya Kohno wrote: > It sounds that IP network was envisaged to be monolithic and seamless. But > at least in the current best practice, filtering and data

Re: [DMM] SRv6 for Mobile User-Plane

It sounds that IP network was envisaged to be monolithic and seamless. But at least in the current best practice, filtering and data plane source validation are done at the edge of controlled administrative domain. So the basic assumption may be different? Miya On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:46 PM,

Re: [DMM] SRv6 for Mobile User-Plane

Pablo, First of all, thank you for your thorough review on the draft, and concrete proposal to improve it. I think I agree almost on the three proposals. Let me comment on some of your points. > [...snip...] > > I believe its straightforward to support IPv4 UE traffic by doing SRv6 with >

Re: [DMM] SRv6 for Mobile User-Plane

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 5:33 PM, Voyer, Daniel wrote: > Tom, > > In respect of this current draft, and highlighted by Pablo’s comments, is to > propose adding to this draft the use of encapsulation as default behavior for > v4/v6 traffic. > > The use of EH insertion is

Re: [DMM] SRv6 for Mobile User-Plane

Tom, In respect of this current draft, and highlighted by Pablo’s comments, is to propose adding to this draft the use of encapsulation as default behavior for v4/v6 traffic. The use of EH insertion is totally the operator’s discretion, within the operator domain if the operator chose to. I

Re: [DMM] SRv6 for Mobile User-Plane

On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) wrote: > Hello authors, DMM, > > > > I have reviewed your I-D on SRv6 for mobile user-plane and I would like to > make some proposals. I have already discussed and brainstormed the details > with some of the authors

[DMM] SRv6 for Mobile User-Plane

Hello authors, DMM, I have reviewed your I-D on SRv6 for mobile user-plane and I would like to make some proposals. I have already discussed and brainstormed the details with some of the authors of the draft and they agree to this changes, however I would like to get the WG feedback on it.

Re: [DMM] SRv6 for Mobile User-Plane

mailer list)" <c...@cisco.com>, "Miya Kohno (mkohno)" <mko...@cisco.com>, "satoru.matsush...@g.softbank.co.jp" <satoru.matsush...@g.softbank.co.jp> Subject: [DMM] SRv6 for Mobile User-Plane Hello authors, DMM, I have reviewed your I-D on SRv6 for

[DMM] SRv6 for mobile user plane

Thinking from an end to end system point of view on how to realize an optimized user plane, I think there needs to be other things in place. For example, its easy say, "lets optimize the data plane", but we need to be able to quantify that optimization and the need for that optimization,