Re: [DMM] Change "Port" to ? [ was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-05.txt]

+1 From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marco Liebsch Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 3:04 AM To: Charlie Perkins Cc: dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] Change "Port" to ? [ was Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-05.txt] Hello Charlie, If we

Re: [DMM] dime - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 98

k. so it's not in the dmm charter? Where then should I submit the 'mobility over diameter' spec then? -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 10:28 PM To: jouni.nospam ;

Re: [DMM] RFC 4006 failover of alternate and backup servers

Wrong list! My apologies! Please disregard. From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2017 9:21 AM To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] RFC 4006 failover of alternate and backup servers All, The CC-Session-Failover AVP in its definition

[DMM] DMM FPC I-D - Implementation

All, Last week at the Intel Developer Forum in San Francisco (US), Intel and Sprint demonstrated a virtual Evolved Packet Core (vEPC) that included, amongst other features, a SGW and PGW (3GPP functions similar to MAG and LMA). This software 1. Used a Separated Control and Dataplane

Re: [DMM] DMM FPC I-D - Implementation

g/wiki/System_Architecture_Evolution I think you are confused by the SDN approaches in the control plane in 3GPP. However, 3GPP decided not to pursue SDN. But they will pursue NFV instead. FYI. Regards, Behcet On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] <lyle.t.be...@sprint.co

Re: [DMM] We can't extract the YANG model from draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp

Thank you Benoit for pointing this out. We will correct in the next update. Lyle -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 10:07 AM To: draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-c...@ietf.org; dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] We can't

Re: [DMM] YANG validation issue in draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-06.txt

We will as soon as we can isolate the error. The error is unhelpful. Do you have any guidance on it? Also, is there any way to rid ourselves of those tailf warnings? They happen quite often and our developers now ignore most errors coming from confd as noise. -Original Message-

Re: [DMM] YANG validation issue in draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-06.txt

There appears to be a bug in either the submission tool or confd (I suspect it has to do with caching and updates). Will take this offline. Lyle -Original Message- From: Benoit Claise [mailto:bcla...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 8:19 AM To: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] <lyle.t

Re: [DMM] FPC: Move Descriptor-/Action-Value into Rule

. From: Marco Liebsch [mailto:marco.lieb...@neclab.eu] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 9:54 AM To: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] <lyle.t.be...@sprint.com>; dmm@ietf.org Subject: RE: FPC: Move Descriptor-/Action-Value into Rule Hi Lyle, I see the analysis you brought, thanks for that. My proposal #2 is

Re: [DMM] FPC: Move Descriptor-/Action-Value into Rule

Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 23:45 > To: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] <lyle.t.be...@sprint.com>; dmm@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [DMM] FPC: Move Descriptor-/Action-Value into Rule > > So, then I don’t see the point of changing the current structure. Other > opinions? > > From: Bertz,

Re: [DMM] FPC: Move Descriptor-/Action-Value into Rule

define. > > Does the type define type of value, or type of action/descritor? > > Cheers, > --satoru > >> 2017/11/28 14:11、Moses, Danny <danny.mo...@intel.com>のメール: >> >> I am OK with the current structure. >> >> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun.

Re: [DMM] FPC: Move Descriptor-/Action-Value into Rule

Marco, Thank you for the write up of both proposals. Forgive the length of the response but I wanted to provide concrete examples based upon the existing data types. Summary, see below for examples and details: - Satoru's Proposal (Proposal 1) - the use of only ID/Type could be

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03 as DMM WG document

I support the adoption. From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 6:03 PM To: dmm@ietf.org Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-matsushima-spring-dmm-srv6-mobile-uplane-03 as DMM WG document Folks: The following message

Re: [DMM] Fwd: Re: [5gangip] To initiate user-plane study work in 3GPP

Am I understanding that the hypothesis is that a 128 bit space (ID) is sufficient to represent what is required in the packet to meet current and planned mobility related use cases when coupled with the rest of the IPv6 standard header information (5-tuple)? -Original Message- From:

[DMM] FPC version 09 - changes

All, **This is not a new version of FPC** I am merely sending out the list of changes for the one sent out last week. Version 09 is the result of work at IETF 99 and subsequent meetings. Changes since the last version: 1. No new features added (sorry) but just better support for a.

Re: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-12.txt

FYI - This is a YANG fix for default config statements to be consistent with NMDA statements made in the Appendix. Apologies for the submission spam. Please look at the version 11 diff for substantive updates. Lyle > -Original Message- > From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On

Re: [DMM] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp-11.txt

All, The following changes have been made since version 10 as noted during IETF 101: Service-Endpoints eliminated. Service-Group and DPN interfaces changed to hold information previously held by Service-Endpoint as noted in *ML* during IETF 101. Scrubbed YANG for

[DMM] New Version Notification for draft-bertz-dime-diamimpr-01.txt

This is a version bump A new version of I-D, draft-bertz-dime-diamimpr-01.txt has been successfully submitted by Lyle Bertz and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-bertz-dime-diamimpr Revision: 01 Title: Diameter Specification Recommendations Document date:

[DMM] New Version Notification for draft-bertz-dime-predictunits-03.txt

This is a version bump A new version of I-D, draft-bertz-dime-predictunits-03.txt has been successfully submitted by Lyle Bertz and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-bertz-dime-predictunits Revision: 03 Title: Diameter Predicted Units Document date: 2017-12-29

[DMM] New Version Notification for draft-bertz-dime-policygroups-05.txt

Version bump and we have a basic implementation (just the data structures) started here https://gerrit.opencord.org/#/admin/projects/c3po? A new version of I-D, draft-bertz-dime-policygroups-05.txt has been successfully submitted by Lyle Bertz and posted to the IETF repository. Name:

Re: [DMM] Parent versus child mobility context

Comments inline. -Original Message- From: Charlie Perkins [mailto:charles.perk...@earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 11:54 AM To: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] <lyle.t.be...@sprint.com>; Marco Liebsch <marco.lieb...@neclab.eu> Cc: dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: Parent versus ch

Re: [DMM] Question about Interface Groups (formerly, DPN Groups)

ity scenarios is not placing the operator in a > comfortable situation. From: Charlie Perkins <charles.perk...@earthlink.net> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 7:10 PM To: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] Cc: dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: Question about Interface Groups (forme

[DMM] FPC Touchpoint - Interface Groups

:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0600 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3 END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN="Bertz, Lyle T [CTO]":MAILTO:lyle.t.be...@sprint.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=dmm@ietf.o rg:MAILTO:dm

[DMM] FYI - FPC Working sessions

END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN="Bertz, Lyle T [CTO]":MAILTO:lyle.t.be...@sprint.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=Charlie Pe rkins:MAILTO:charles.perk...@earthlink.net ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=TRUE;CN=

Re: [DMM] Policy in the FPC draft - definitions, context transfer, keys, indexing, etc.

Charlie, Thanks for the example. A couple of notes. I appears that in your proposed terminology for Descriptors and Actions it is not clear where Attribute Values appear. Are they the Settings we’ve been using? To your proposal “For simplicity, I suggest that the Policy Keys enable access

[DMM] Updated FPC Working Sessions

END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0600 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=2SU;BYMONTH=3 END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT ORGANIZER;CN="Bertz, Lyle T [CTO]":MAILTO:lyle.t.be...@sprint.com ATTENDEE;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-A

[DMM] FPC Policy - Working Session & Concepts

All, For tomorrow we'll start the work on Policy. Concepts. Policy structure (Policy, Rule, Descriptor and Action) definitions are templates. They may be complete or require further complementary information, referred to as Settings, to complete them. Indexed (given a key) structures are

[DMM] FPC Working Session - 31JAN2018

Good progress. 1. Validated entity model can support DDDS selection (3GPP, IETF) 2. 2 proposals enclosed with updates per todays' discussion & a few open questions. Tomorrow is open questions and starting policy. Lyle This e-mail may contain

Re: [DMM] FPC - Topology

Comments inline From: Charlie Perkins [mailto:charles.perk...@earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 12:20 PM To: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] <lyle.t.be...@sprint.com>; dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] FPC - Topology Hello Lyle, I have comments on the slides, and could benefit from

[DMM] FPC meetings - Cancelling tomorrow's meeting

All, I sent out invites for FPC meetings for 1 hour daily at 9 am CST a few weeks ago. We are cancelling tomorrow's meeting so that we can focus on document updates. Thanks! Lyle This e-mail may contain Sprint proprietary information intended for the sole

Re: [DMM] FPC meetings - Cancelling tomorrow's meeting

ut Section 4 (except the last item) but the implication is a streamlined protocol model Lyle -Original Message- From: Satoru Matsushima [mailto:satoru.matsush...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 9:25 PM To: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] <lyle.t.be...@sprint.com> Cc: dmm@ietf.org Subj

[DMM] FPC Calls

Due to scheduling conflicts we are cancelling today and tomorrow's calls. See y'all on Friday. Lyle This e-mail may contain Sprint proprietary information intended for the sole use of the recipient(s). Any use by others is prohibited. If you are not the

Re: [DMM] FPC Working Session

Due to schedules, the daily meetings for FPC are cancelled for this Thursday and Friday. Lyle -Original Appointment- From: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 12:54 PM To: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO]; Charlie Perkins; Satoru Matsushima; Marco Liebsch; Sri Gundavelli (sgundave

Re: [DMM] Question about Interface Groups

No, I don’t think they should reside under a DPN. Groups like these also span multiple DPNs which would make containment graphs far too confusing. From: Charlie Perkins [mailto:charles.perk...@earthlink.net] Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2018 10:51 PM To: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] <lyle.t

Re: [DMM] Question about Interface Groups (formerly, DPN Groups)

not be able to serve in the same group. Lyle From: Charlie Perkins [mailto:charles.perk...@earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 3:25 PM To: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] <lyle.t.be...@sprint.com> Cc: dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: Question about Interface Groups (formerly, DPN Groups) Hello Lyle, I

Re: [DMM] Parent versus child mobility context

More inline. -Original Message- From: Charlie Perkins [mailto:charles.perk...@earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 2:27 PM To: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] <lyle.t.be...@sprint.com> Cc: dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] Parent versus child mobility context Hello Lyle, More fol

Re: [DMM] Indexed sets

YANG models" to "the FPC YANG models" as we do not want to speak for all YANG models. -Original Message- From: Charlie Perkins [mailto:charles.perk...@earthlink.net] Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2018 11:11 PM To: Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] <lyle.t.be...@sprint.com> Cc: Marco Liebsc

Re: [DMM] Parent versus child mobility context

<charles.perk...@earthlink.net>; Bertz, Lyle T [CTO] <lyle.t.be...@sprint.com> Cc: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsush...@gmail.com>; Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <sgund...@cisco.com>; Moses, Danny <danny.mo...@intel.com>; Weaver, Farni [CTO] <farni.wea...@sprint.com>

Re: [DMM] IETF101 - Call for agenda items

Sri: Please add the following if Charlie has not already requested. Topic Name: FPC update Time: 30 minutes Draft Reference: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp.txt Lyle -Original Message- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)