Hi Luke,
I should point out, the ACL criteria for matching processes do not all have
to be specified, specifically for the reason you point out. Using the
SHA256 to match the process should be a tool of last resort, useful only
when the executable's path, inode number, and PID listing commands
Interesting read, thanks!
The ACL logic though doesn't seem quite right.
Having to do SHA digests on binaries to be sure you're granting access
to the right program doesn't seem correct at all. It's fragile: if the
program is updated with a new version it will stop working until the ACL
is
On 26 December 2014 at 23:55, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
I have compiled Econnman from Enlightenment project, its is a GUI for
Connman but, I still did not tested it in deep.
It is hosted at my Ubuntu PPA: `ppa:martinx/enlightenment`.
Maybe, if we stick with
Hi folks,
do we already have defined workflows for package submission ?
I'm usually maintaining everything in git repos, where each distro
has a separate branch, which directly adds ./debian/ directory
and all necessary changes - no additional patches etc.
For example:
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 04:52:11PM +0100, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm just packaging Jude's fskit to various deb distros using
pbuilder + git-buildpackage.
Unfortunately, the .so's loose the +x flag in the package
(while usual 'make install' is okay) - it
On 02.01.2015 18:12, Isaac Dunham wrote:
ls -l /lib/i386-linux-gnu/
in my Debian partition shows all .so's except ld-2.19.so being chmod a-x.
Already got an answer on debian-devel: +x is not required and
should not be set (except some rare cases).
The interesting question here is: why does
On venerdì 2 gennaio 2015 19:50:52 CEST, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
On 26 December 2014 at 23:55, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
I have compiled Econnman from Enlightenment project, its is a GUI for
Connman but, I still did not tested it in deep.
It is hosted at my Ubuntu
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 07:05:24PM +0100, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
wrote:
Hi folks,
do we already have defined workflows for package submission ?
I'm usually maintaining everything in git repos, where each distro
has a separate branch, which directly adds ./debian/ directory
Hi,
Did you have any luck with the packaging scripts under tools/? If you
have fpm [1] installed, just running 'make' in the tools/ directory
should generate some .debs.
No. And I strongly disagree with individual source packages carrying
their own dist-packaging stuff. Instead the distro's
