On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:05:03 +0100
John Crisp jcr...@safeandsoundit.co.uk wrote:
I read the following article a while back and the one reply that
really actually made the most sense to me and summed up my feelings
that there are wider political issues at stake - this was on page 3
of the
After reading the whole keep as close to debian as possible thread, and in
my well-known spirit of resuming threads, I think we can benefit from the
Principle of the Onion.
At first stage (Devuan Jessie), we'll use a pinned repository with our
desinfected packages, to provide our users (that's
Steve Litt:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:28:58 +0100 (CET)
k...@aspodata.se wrote:
At second thought, I'll first try to factor out udev completely -- or
rather -- make the system to be *dev agnostic.
Karl, please document your experiment so that some of us can follow in
your footsteps.
I
Isaac Dunham (Mon, 16 Feb 2015 07:06:59):
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 08:44:22PM +, Luke Leighton wrote:
...
Thanks to your write-up, I've gotten Xorg working sans udev
(actually, simulated via overmounting with tmpfs and running mdev).
FYI, *this* was why I included devinfo in libsysdev:
for
Dragan FOSS:
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 16:27:55 +
From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton l...@lkcl.net
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: [Dng] successfully manually removing systemd and libsystemd0
from debian and still maintaining a working desktop
Message-ID:
Luke Leighton l...@lkcl.net:
karl at aspodata.se writes:
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton lkcl at lkcl.net:
http://lkcl.net/reports/removing_systemd_from_debian/
I'll try that.
awesome. if you'd like to keep in touch (through this list
if that's ok with the dng team?) i can perhaps
Luke Leighton:
karl please refresh and double-check the update for pulseaudio,
I don't need pulseaudio, sorry.
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
---
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57
it's my understanding that most additions to the kernel from hardware
companies are for drivers. i can only assume the rest are for new features
they want to use or random bug fixes. i think the linux kernel itself is
safe from needless radical changes because the linux kernel people actually
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 20:26:06 +
Nuno Magalhães nunomagalh...@eu.ipp.pt wrote:
I'm here because i want choice and i like stuff to be modular and
open, not closed and monolithic (unless we're talking about Clarke's
2001).
Nuno,
You've just almost completely described my intentions in one
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:48:12 +
Noel Torres env...@rolamasao.org wrote:
To resume the principle: The best way to create a very complex
project is to add one layer at a time.
I like it! Life's a journey, and a journey of a thousand miles begins
with a single step.
SteveT
Steve Litt
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 17:28:58 +0100 (CET)
k...@aspodata.se wrote:
At second thought, I'll first try to factor out udev completely -- or
rather -- make the system to be *dev agnostic.
Karl, please document your experiment so that some of us can follow in
your footsteps.
A no udev box isn't
On 19/02/15 13:36, hal wrote:
Hello all, and great work on the Alpha! I am tagging this off-topic as it
doesn't really pertain to Devuan development except in a tangential aspect.
I've always thought it a bit odd that just a handful of people, leading
certain Open Source projects, could
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:05:03 +0100
John Crisp jcr...@safeandsoundit.co.uk wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/12/01/ttsystemdtt_row_ends_with_debian_getting_forked/
Wow, this article (the article itself, not the replies) has a mislead
right off the bat:
The dispute centred on plans to
On 19/02/15 18:38, Steve Litt wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:05:03 +0100
John Crisp jcr...@safeandsoundit.co.uk wrote:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/12/01/ttsystemdtt_row_ends_with_debian_getting_forked/
Trade mag journalists. Can't live with them, can't live without
them. :-)
LOl -
14 matches
Mail list logo
