Symlinking /bin to /usr/bin only seems like they are trying for a unified tree
approach which is an ill design. If that's the case they should just install
everything in /opt in it's own micro-tree/branch. Yes, it doesn't make sense
because you have to use an initramfs if you use a separated
Le 30/04/2015 01:27, Joerg Reisenweber a écrit :
On Wed 29 April 2015 23:46:51 Didier Kryn wrote:
They decided to put them on the second disk which contained user data
and was therefore mounted at /usr
AFAIK that's Unix System Resources or somesuch, not User
Maybe it's true, but it sounds
The discussion has not been favorable towards the adoption from current reading
on LKML. Past tests have not proven reliability, nor any significant increase
of speed of messaging across the IPC. Linus seems to be of no love for it.
IMO from the collective discussion, kdbus doesn't seem to be
Having watched other systems transitioning to systemd, I wouldn't be surprised
if they did, or the projects get pushed into forced deprecation as ConsoleKit
did before it was revived.
-Jim
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:19:25 -0400
From: hend...@topoi.pooq.com
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject:
On 28/04/15 21:00, Alex 'AdUser' Z wrote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9450806
Hot discussion about merging kdbus in kernel.
TL;DR: The people who talk about how kdbus improves performance are just
full of sh*t. (c) Linus
It is certainly a deep and wide ranging thread. When looked at
On Thu 30 April 2015 10:12:30 Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
From the FreeBSD point of view:
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/dirstructure.html
and here is more (sorry to link to the obvious):
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html (possibly outdated, I didn't
check for a
Le 30/04/2015 13:21, Joerg Reisenweber a écrit :
and here is more (sorry to link to the obvious):
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html (possibly outdated, I didn't
check for a long time)
Thanks Joerg, for recalling the link.
This FHS is nothing more than a summary of current
On Thu 30 April 2015 15:30:06 Didier Kryn wrote:
This FHS is nothing more than a summary of current practice; it
does not contain any sound rationale
I beg to differ on that, to me it seems it has all the sound rationale it
needs, to for example understand why /bin should have commands
On Thu 30 April 2015 19:02:54 Laurent Bercot wrote:
/sbin/route is not inherently better than
/bin/route; we are just used to /sbin/route and inertia does the rest - but
it would actually be *simpler* to just move everything to /bin and /usr/bin
and be rid of /sbin and /usr/sbin altogether. It
On Thu 30 April 2015 19:02:54 Laurent Bercot wrote:
- Made sense at the time, doesn't make sense today: the separation between
administrator commands (/sbin, /usr/sbin) and user commands (/bin,
/usr/bin). Back then, filesystems were slow and scaled badly, caches were
small, and it was costly
On Thu 30 April 2015 19:02:54 Laurent Bercot wrote:
It would also shorten PATHs,
which would be a definite blessing on some systems.
I guess - just like you said, and according to RFC2119 SHOULD (NOT) - you
could simply symlink /sbin to /bin on your system when there's a good reason
for doing
On April 29, 2015 1:19:25 PM GMT+01:00, Hendrik Boom hend...@topoi.pooq.com
wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:31:16AM +0200, Franco Lanza wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 05:16:42PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
acpid and acpi-support-base have already been removed from tasksel.
We
On 01/05/15 01:32, Franco Lanza wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 01:44:47AM +0100, David Hare wrote:
debootstrap --exclude systemd,systemd-sysv,libsystemd0 jessie .
without specifying a URL is working here (are the excludes needed?)
However after I chroot it and apt update:
W: GPG error:
Hi James,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:26 AM, James Powell james4...@hotmail.com wrote:
The discussion has not been favorable towards the adoption from current
reading on LKML. Past tests have not proven reliability, nor any
significant increase of speed of messaging across the IPC. Linus seems
Edward Bartolo edb...@gmail.com writes:
I replaced stable with jessie as follows. debootstrap did better but
failed. These are the results:
# debootstrap --arch amd64 jessie /mnt/sda8
http://packages.devuan.org/devuan/
I: Extracting util-linux...
W: Failure trying to run: chroot
On 30/04/2015 22:35, Joerg Reisenweber wrote:
exactly this PATH issue is what I expect and appreciate here: I do NOT expect
command autocompletion of normal user to get confused by command names that
are not supposed to even be in user's PATH
0700 for root-only binaries would hide them from
Le 30/04/2015 20:16, John Morris a écrit :
The FHS was carefully designed to accomodate things like NFS root,
readonly NFS mounting of parts of the system, mandating things like
*/share/ to only contain arch neutral data, etc.
The whole FH can be shared by NFS root, except /var, which
17 matches
Mail list logo
