On Sat, 2 May 2015 09:03:30 -0700
"DLL Hell" wrote:
> For some reason the men in the Linux community who hate women the
> most seem to have taken a dislike to systemd. I understand that being
> “conservative” might mean not wanting changes to software as well as
> not wanting changes to inequali
The command I used:
debootstrap --arch amd64 jessie /mnt/sda8 http://packages.devuan.org/merged
/mnt/sda8 is the partition where Devuan was installed.
I will now start testing Devuan.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.o
Has there been any inkling yet of a Devuan iso or bootdisk that we can unpack
something similar to a Gentoo-like stage3 tarball that needs minimal
configuring?
-Jim
> Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 18:47:46 +0200
> From: arya...@chello.at
> To: dng@lists.dyne.org
> Subject: Re: [Dng] still failing to in
Sorry, for my input here, but the title says nothing but laughable bullshit.
There is no evidence anywhere scientific or not that being anti-systemd makes
you a woman hater. I'm anti-systemd and have been happily married for 12 years.
This seems more of a spin mastering by radicals wanting to pu
Well, I'll comment on a couple points, since the material you quoted
is rather misleading at best.
Full disclosure:
My only associations with the VUA are (1) subscribing to this list;
(2) using the devuan repositories, and (3) having an account on the
devuan gitlab, which I have only used to mirro
On Sat 02 May 2015 11:01:07 Laurent Bercot wrote:
> > So there are very good reasons for keeping the classic/standard layout.
>
> The reasons you gave so far are pretty minor.
The reasons you gave for *changing* stuff are negligible so far: iirc it was a
"shorter PATH which would benefit some
Spam detection software, running on the system "tupac2",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content prev
On 02/05/15 16:23, Nextime wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Sorry for top posting, i'm from smartphone.
The right repo to be used is packages.devuan.org/merged to have a full filled
repository
- --
nextime
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: APG v1.1.1
iHIEAREKADIFA
etbe.coker.com.au/2015/04/26/anti-systemd-people/
Anti-Systemd People
For the Technical People
This post isn’t really about technology, I’ll cover the technology briefly skip
to the next section if you aren’t interested in Linux programming or system
administration.
I’ve been using the Systemd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On May 2, 2015 9:05:20 AM CEST, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>I downloaded debootstrap's source from:
>https://git.devuan.org/packages-base/debootstrap and built a .deb
>package on Debian Testing. Then, I used the freshly installed
>debootstrap to install
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:42:24PM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote:
>
> Le 30/04/2015 20:16, John Morris a écrit :
> >The FHS was carefully designed to accomodate things like NFS root,
> >readonly NFS mounting of parts of the system, mandating things like
> >*/share/ to only contain arch neutral data, e
On 02/05/15 08:05, Edward Bartolo wrote:
I downloaded debootstrap's source from:
https://git.devuan.org/packages-base/debootstrap and built a .deb
package on Debian Testing. Then, I used the freshly installed
debootstrap to install Devuan as follows:
# debootstrap --arch amd64 jessie /mnt/sda8 h
Le 02/05/2015 10:52, marc...@welz.org.za a écrit :
> >Now as for other assertions in this thread that the FHS itself is
> >obsolete and violations of it should not be considered a bad thing, just
> >no.
>
> I don't think anyone said that.
I did. Shame on me.
Didier
On 02/05/2015 10:52, marc...@welz.org.za wrote:
... confusing - it is unclear if he is arguing that departures from the
standard should be entertained or not.
I am arguing that FHS includes good things and bad things, and that
good things should be followed and bad things should not. In other
On 02/05/2015 09:43, marc...@welz.org.za wrote:
0700 for root-only binaries would hide them from your shell's
autocompletion.
Which would be lots of stat() system calls.
If a shell doesn't make them, then it doesn't verify that a file is
executable either. (I just checked with zsh: it do
Me again
So I am going to quote Laurent a bit out of order, sorry about
that, but it seems the best way to explain things:
> >Now as for other assertions in this thread that the FHS itself is
> >obsolete and violations of it should not be considered a bad thing, just
> >no.
>
> I don't think an
On 02/05/15 09:05, Edward Bartolo wrote:
I downloaded debootstrap's source from:
https://git.devuan.org/packages-base/debootstrap and built a .deb
package on Debian Testing. Then, I used the freshly installed
debootstrap to install Devuan as follows:
# debootstrap --arch amd64 jessie /mnt/sda8
> On 30/04/2015 22:35, Joerg Reisenweber wrote:
> >exactly this PATH issue is what I expect and appreciate here: I do NOT
> >expect
> >command autocompletion of normal user to get confused by command names that
> >are not supposed to even be in user's PATH
>
> 0700 for root-only binaries would h
I downloaded debootstrap's source from:
https://git.devuan.org/packages-base/debootstrap and built a .deb
package on Debian Testing. Then, I used the freshly installed
debootstrap to install Devuan as follows:
# debootstrap --arch amd64 jessie /mnt/sda8 http://packages.devuan.org/devuan
W: Cannot
19 matches
Mail list logo
