On 25/06/15 17:04, Jude Nelson wrote:
Hey everyone,
After a longer-than-expected development cycle, I have the latest news
for vdev.
The TL;DR is that vdev has gained enough infrastructure to generate the
information that normally gets put in /run/udev. This is important for
most libudev
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 01:04:24AM -0400, Jude Nelson wrote:
Hey everyone,
After a longer-than-expected development cycle, I have the latest news for
vdev.
The TL;DR is that vdev has gained enough infrastructure to generate the
information that normally gets put in /run/udev. This is
On 18/06/15 13:47, Didier Kryn wrote:
[...]
I wonder if now is the time to start separating out the init specific
configuration files, initscripts or service files, libraries and
binaries out into separate packages so that any particular init can be
supported without treading on the toes of
Hello everyone,
I've been lurking on this list for a couple of weeks, and this is my
first post here. I'd like to start by saying a big thank you to those
working hard to bring us debian jessie and beyond without
systemd. I like to keep an open mind, so after reading arguments for
and against
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the bug report. Yes this is a very net-install mini iso (I
think debian refered to it previously as the business card iso) which
has only just enough bits to get on the net to download the resot of the
installer. We don't yet produce the fuller iso matching debian's
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:58:59 +0200
Mat m...@parad0x.org wrote:
So in general I think that this approach - moving init system specific
things out of the main package and providing one package per init
system
- is a good way of supporting multiple init systems.
For instance:
