Am 04.04.2016 um 08:58 schrieb Boruch Baum:
> [...]
> I'm getting a bit uncomfortable about starting this thread, because
> upon reflection, it seems that one consequence of setting the
> system-wide may be that the 027 umask will end up having some system
> account creating a file that should be
>> I'm getting a bit uncomfortable about starting this thread, because upon
>> reflection, it seems that one consequence of setting the system-wide may
>> be that the 027 umask will end up having some system account creating a
>> file that should be world-readable or world-executable, but because
On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 11:09:01 +0300
Mitt Green wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lennart_Poettering=703955376
Occupation: Bloatware generator.
I would have added:
Slogan: Do you hate disabled people ?
SteveT
Steve Litt
March 2016 featured book:
Boruch Baum writes:
- some clarifications as I tend to forget how far remove from 'everyday
experiences' this stuff happens to be -
> On 04/04/2016 11:22 AM, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
[...]
>> [*] "Everyday real-world example": One of the things I'm dealing with
>> is a
Boruch Baum writes:
[...]
> 2.2] umask. This was a shocker, security-wise. The default umask is set
> to 022 instead of the better 027 or, my preference, 077. My memory is
> that on other systems on which I've seen the command seemingly
> hard-coded for 022, the fix to 027
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:53:29PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote:
> On 04/04/16 16:19, KatolaZ wrote:
>
> >(unfortunately Linux does not run on microcontrollers, yet, mainly due
> >to the general lack of some form of underlying MMU in the vast
> >majority of microcontrollers...).
>
>
On 04/04/2016 11:22 AM, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Boruch Baum writes:
>> Please consider setting the default /etc/fstab to include:
>>
>> proc/proc procdefaults,hidepid=2
>>
>> This has the effect of keeping the specific activities, process
>> ids,
Boruch Baum writes:
> Please consider setting the default /etc/fstab to include:
>
> proc/proc procdefaults,hidepid=2
>
> This has the effect of keeping the specific activities, process ids,
> command lines and parameters of a user from other users.
Mitt Green writes:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lennart_Poettering=703955376
The joke is a little too clumsy to qualify as well-done satire and I
could have done without being notified of it ...
___
Dng mailing
Boruch Baum writes:
[...]
> You know what. How about this. Think of systemd as that girlfriend you
> broke up with. You've decided to dump systemd,
Did I? It rather reminds me of these commercial ladies I meet in the
streets every once in a while and who can - at times -
Boruch Baum wrote:
You know what. How about this. Think of systemd as that girlfriend you
broke up with. You've decided to dump systemd, so be done with it.
Leave
it behind and move on. It's over. If you can't forget about her, its
not
over, and frankly, something in your head is messed up.
Boruch Baum wrote:
> Sorry to ruin the party, but I'll object to it because its just not a
> nice thing to do, and its an awful thing to mess up content on the fine
> site that is wikipedia.
+1 for that
Regardless of what people think of him, it's not a grown up or pleasant
Simon Walter wrote:
...so challenging his actions on a technical level would be difficult.
Not really. Take a look at systemd changelogs, and you'll find out,
how many new "features" it has now. It now has X11 and a terminal.
And your screen brightness can't be lower than 5%, because the
Le 03/04/2016 23:18, Hendrik Boom a écrit :
It's a formal art form, and occasionally amusing.
Yes, some are really nice to watch. I'd like to be able to run them
independtly of the concept of a screen-saver which doesn't make much
sense today.
Didier
I'm NOT specifically ranting against either Simon or Trond below. I'm
addressing the wider issue, that I think is pretty obvious to anyone
following this list for any amount of time.
On 04/04/2016 09:00 AM, Simon Walter wrote:
> On 2016/04/04 17:39, Trond Arild Ydersbond wrote:
>> Den Mandag, 4.
On 2016/04/04 17:39, Trond Arild Ydersbond wrote:
Den Mandag, 4. april 2016 8.09 skrev Mitt Green :
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lennart_Poettering=703955376
Representing him as an ass and bloatware generator is definitely not in the
interest of those
Den Mandag, 4. april 2016 8.09 skrev Mitt Green :
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lennart_Poettering=703955376
Representing him as an ass and bloatware generator is definitely not in the
interest of those challenging his actions as a developer. Why the
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 06:58:39AM +, Boruch Baum wrote:
[cut]
>
> I'm getting a bit uncomfortable about starting this thread, because upon
> reflection, it seems that one consequence of setting the system-wide may
> be that the 027 umask will end up having some system account creating a
>
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 08:05:05PM -0400, Boruch Baum wrote:
[cut]
>
> 2] /etc/profile
>
> 2.1] $PATH for users includes by default two specialty (and frivolous)
> entries - for games folders. This strikes me as inconsistent with what's
> meant to be a "universal OS" that can be expected to be
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lennart_Poettering=703955376
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
On 04/04/2016 06:17 AM, tilt! wrote:
> Am 04.04.2016 um 04:54 schrieb fsmithred:
>>session optional pam_umask.so umask=0022"
>
> Add such customization to
>
>/etc/pam.d/common-session
>
> instead. The statement should appear after the end of the block that is
> automatically updated by
On 04/03/16 23:19, fsmithred wrote:
Nice guide. Thanks.
I was thinking more along the lines of this set of instructions for a
debootstrap install to hard drive, rather than with live build.
22 matches
Mail list logo