Re: [DNG] ..another new(?) step towards Debian systemd: linux-image-4.6.0-1[-rt]-amd-signed, with MSTF keys...

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 06:54:20AM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > ..another new(?) step towards Debian systemd: > linux-image-4.6.0-1[-rt]-amd-signed, with MSTF keys... : > https://packages.debian.org/sid/linux-image-4.6.0-1-rt-amd64-signed > https://wiki.debian.org/SecureBoot >

[DNG] ..another new(?) step towards Debian systemd: linux-image-4.6.0-1[-rt]-amd-signed, with MSTF keys...

Hi, ..another new(?) step towards Debian systemd: linux-image-4.6.0-1[-rt]-amd-signed, with MSTF keys... : https://packages.debian.org/sid/linux-image-4.6.0-1-rt-amd64-signed https://wiki.debian.org/SecureBoot https://burtness.wordpress.com/2014/02/08/secure-boot-with-debian-testing/ ..we

Re: [DNG] package request

Am Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:48:02 + schrieb Go Linux : > I use palemoon sometimes. I actually run it (and tor) from my /user > directory. The problem with ANY browser other than FF/Iceweasel is > the lack of addons - I use about 25. (Chrome is the worst at this.) > Palemoon

Re: [DNG] package request

On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:16:50 +0200 wrote: > Would it be possible to package palemoon for devuan? > > Since a while, i am unhappy with firefox/iceweasel and trying here and > there i found that, from a users point of view, palemoon would be a > very valid and viable

Re: [DNG] How to acknowledge ported version of Open Source program?

Thanks for the insightful comments. The README file in Geodome (http://geodome.sourceforge.net/) source contains the following license terms. LICENSE Copyright � 2004,2005Edward A. Falk Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this

Re: [DNG] Devuan powered

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 11:24:48AM -0400, aitor_czr wrote: > Hi Hellekin, > > I would like to use the following slogan for the beta of gnuinos: > > *DEVUAN POWERED* > > Did you use an existing typography for the logo of devuan or, on the > contrary, is there a need for designing all the letters

Re: [DNG] Request for Removal of slim package from Devuan

On 11/06/16 14:01, Jaromil wrote: dear Rowland, On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Rowland Penny wrote: Now go away troll. we identify this person already as MikeeUSA http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/MikeeUSA his new address is already banned from the mailinglist and so will be any other in the future.

Re: [DNG] Request for Removal of slim package from Devuan

dear Rowland, On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Rowland Penny wrote: > Now go away troll. we identify this person already as MikeeUSA http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/MikeeUSA his new address is already banned from the mailinglist and so will be any other in the future. you are probably replying a private

[DNG] Palemoon profiles (was: package request)

Since people here like Palemoon, I'll share a little handy hack Since I started using Palemoon (which was recommended to me by Parazyd months ago) I missed very much the support of profiles. I need them to start *quick* a new browser with one of the profiles I create, isolating cookies and saved

Re: [DNG] Request for Removal of slim package from Devuan

On 11/06/16 13:38, concernedfoss...@teknik.io wrote: Why don't you fking adopt bastille-linux and update it from time to time if you "don't hate" it so much? Till then you're a liar and a faker. Full stop. Why should I update something I don't use, something I am ambivalent to ?? I have

Re: [DNG] LXC template for Devuan

Greetings, Just a quick update. The problem we had with lxc-devuan is indeed a version incompatibility between the later LXC version 1.1.5 and the Devuan version 1.0.6. But hey, at least we're ready for the later version! I haven't updated on GitLab yet, but the good news is I already have

[DNG] Devuan powered

Hi Hellekin, I would like to use the following slogan for the beta of gnuinos: *DEVUAN POWERED* Did you use an existing typography for the logo of devuan or, on the contrary, is there a need for designing all the letters one by one? In the case of an existing typography, is it a free font?

Re: [DNG] package request

On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 10:08:04 +0200, Emninger wrote: > > I wanted to add a question: If devuan wants to stay small and compact, > which as a principle is fine IMHO, AIUI, Devuan strives to be versatile, not necessarily compact. That would be a characteristic of some (in want of a better word)

Re: [DNG] package request

Am Sat, 11 Jun 2016 04:33:34 + schrieb Irrwahn : > The deb-packaged version by Steven Pusser I already mentioned > in another subthread did not show such issues at the time I > installed it: > >

Re: [DNG] Request for Removal of slim package from Devuan

On 11/06/16 02:07, concernedfoss...@teknik.io wrote: Just because a piece of software has been abandoned doesn't mean that it is garbage. My personal opinion is that 'slim' was abandoned because it is garbage. A dev is not required to work on a piece of software forever: eventually