On Fri, 2017-03-03 at 10:09 -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> What default cryptographic identity would it use?
>
> -- hendrik
My notion is an email client should look for a keyring and if it can't
find one it should default to creating a basic key and publishing it to
one or more keyservers.
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 12:03:02AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
I haven't yet gotten to the point of using privacy I don't need
personally, as is obvious by this unsigned email.
I always sign my messages.
From what I understand, if my message is signed (and the signature is
valid), then it is
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 08:52:41AM -0600, ja...@beau.org wrote:
> > And then there's what Jamie said: By all being private, we make the
> > truly private stand out less. I haven't yet gotten to the point of
> > using privacy I don't need personally, as is obvious by this unsigned
> > email.
>
> >
> And then there's what Jamie said: By all being private, we make the
> truly private stand out less. I haven't yet gotten to the point of
> using privacy I don't need personally, as is obvious by this unsigned
> email.
> SteveT
A friend of mine has a bit of a conspiracy theory going - asking
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 11:46:22PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
[cut]
>
> I wonder if Devuan had the foresight in config.h to set
>
> static Bool enableplugins = FALSE;
>
> Straight from Suckless, it's set to TRUE. If the Devuan developers set
> it to FALSE, that has the same effect as
