Hendrik:
...
> Device Start End Sectors Size Type
> /dev/sdb1 20483481532768 16M unknown
> /dev/sdb2 34816 31116254 31081439 14.8G unknown
# file -s /dev/sdb1
# file -s /dev/sdb2
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
___
Dng mailing list
On 09/12/2019 21:59, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:45:46PM +0100, Antony Stone wrote:
>> On Monday 09 December 2019 at 22:38:26, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>>
>>> I have an sd card that used to be in an android phone.
>>> My usual tools tell me very little:
>>>
>>> root@midwinter:~#
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:45:46PM +0100, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Monday 09 December 2019 at 22:38:26, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
> > I have an sd card that used to be in an android phone.
> > My usual tools tell me very little:
> >
> > root@midwinter:~# lsblk --fs /dev/sdb
> > NAME FSTYPE LABEL
Hello fellow Devuaners !
Any particular reason why on raspberry PI build, in /proc/cpuinfo there
are missing information about "model name" , bigger half of "Features"
line, "Hardware" , "Revision" and "Serial".
It breaks compliance and create issues.
A bug, a regression? or some inheritance?
#
On Monday 09 December 2019 at 22:38:26, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I have an sd card that used to be in an android phone.
> My usual tools tell me very little:
>
> root@midwinter:~# lsblk --fs /dev/sdb
> NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT
> sdb
> ├─sdb1
> └─sdb2
>
> root@midwinter:~# fdisk -l
I have an sd card that used to be in an android phone.
My usua tools tell me very littls:
root@midwinter:~# lsblk --fs /dev/sdb
NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT
sdb
├─sdb1
└─sdb2
root@midwinter:~# fdisk -l /dev/sdb
Disk /dev/sdb: 14.9
On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 22:27:40 +0900, Simon wrote in message
<21ba29b7-b3b8-8266-613e-7935f0d8c...@gikaku.com>:
> On 12/9/19 8:56 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 15:24:05 +0900, Simon wrote in message
> > <6d01ab17-3ab2-bc52-cbb2-f838087fe...@gikaku.com>:
> >> I suppose this is
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Hindley"
To: "Ismael L. Donis Garcia"
Cc: "Devuan"
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2019 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [DNG] Error trying to update beowulf
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 02:48:55PM -0500, Ismael L. Donis Garcia wrote:
I have a local devaun repository
I
Quite an old thread without any reaction to it, but I myself attempted a
migration from buster to beowulf today, and thought about sharing my
experience.
What is the current recommended way to crossgrade from buster to
beowulf (so I can test it properly)
I followed
On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 15:24:05 +0900
Simon Walter wrote:
> ...in at least KDE in Jessie.
>
> /usr/lib/chromium/chromium "--profile-directory=Profile 1"
> --app-id=XXX
>
> I use Chromium for development testing.
> # dpkg --get-selections | grep chromium
> chromium
On 12/9/19 8:56 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 15:24:05 +0900, Simon wrote in message
> <6d01ab17-3ab2-bc52-cbb2-f838087fe...@gikaku.com>:
>> I suppose this is from upstream. Does anyone about this? I thought
>> maybe other privacy conscious users would like to know. It seems like
On Mon, 9 Dec 2019 15:24:05 +0900, Simon wrote in message
<6d01ab17-3ab2-bc52-cbb2-f838087fe...@gikaku.com>:
> ...in at least KDE in Jessie.
>
> /usr/lib/chromium/chromium "--profile-directory=Profile 1"
> --app-id=XXX
>
> I use Chromium for development testing.
> # dpkg --get-selections |
12 matches
Mail list logo
