Quoting g4sra via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
> Can anybody suggest a suitable authoritative/recursive DNSSEC
> supporting name server for SOHO domain use on embedded systems. What
> I am looking for is something like dnsmasq.
dnsmasq, it should be noted, is _just_ a forwarder. It forwards
Also, to manually inspect out a particular IP, e.g. 130.225.254.116, as a
resolution for deb.devuan.org, you would add temporarily a line to /etc/hosts:
130.225.254.116 deb.devuan.org
and then point your sane browser at http://deb.devuan.org/devuan/
Remove that line later,
Ralph.
On 2020-10-29 15:24, radisso...@gmx.de wrote:
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2020 um 20:31 Uhr
Von: "Antony Stone"
An: dng@lists.dyne.org
Betreff: Re: [DNG] devuan ?
On Thursday 29 October 2020 at 19:31:10, radisso...@gmx.de wrote:
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
> Err:1
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2020 um 20:31 Uhr
> Von: "Antony Stone"
> An: dng@lists.dyne.org
> Betreff: Re: [DNG] devuan ?
>
> On Thursday 29 October 2020 at 19:31:10, radisso...@gmx.de wrote:
>
> > Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
> > Err:1 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64
On Thursday 29 October 2020 at 19:31:10, radisso...@gmx.de wrote:
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
> Err:1 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 linux-libc-dev amd64
> 4.19.118-2 404 Not Found [IP: 130.225.254.116 80]
> Unable to correct missing packages.
> E: Failed to fetch
>
On 29/10/2020 18:19, Bernard Rosset via Dng wrote:
>> That said, I've stopped using unbound and I'm using straight BIND as my
>> local resolver lately. It's pleasant.
>
> From what we discovered about unbound during one of the meetings, I clearly
> do not trust that technology. Too bad: it was
On 29/10/2020 18:31, radisso...@gmx.de wrote:
> The problem is a bit weired:
>
> I did install Beowulf 3.0 had some problems nothing i could not fix,
> then i tried to install gcc via apt-get install gcc
>
>
>
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
> Err:1 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main
The problem is a bit weired:
I did install Beowulf 3.0 had some problems nothing i could not fix,
then i tried to install gcc via apt-get install gcc
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Err:1 http://deb.devuan.org/merged beowulf/main amd64 linux-libc-dev amd64
4.19.118-2
404 Not Found [IP:
That said, I've stopped using unbound and I'm using straight BIND as my
local resolver lately. It's pleasant.
From what we discovered about unbound during one of the meetings, I
clearly do not trust that technology. Too bad: it was on my to-test list.
However, unbound is recursive-only IIRC.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 04:53:43PM +, g4sra via Dng wrote:
> Please correct me if I am mistaken, I thought 'unbound' was tied to
> 'systemd creep' nowadays and have been avoiding it for that reason alone.
No, that's systemd-resolved. Unbound is unrelated.
That said, I've stopped using
You're wrong, unbound worked and still works fine without systemd.
Στις 29 Οκτωβρίου 2020 6:53:43 μ.μ. EET, ο/η g4sra via Dng
έγραψε:
>On 29/10/2020 13:44, Michael Neuffer wrote:
>> On 10/29/20 2:27 PM, d...@d404.nl wrote:
>--snip--
>>> To ease the maintenance of those servers i intend to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Yes.
Le Thu, 29 Oct 2020 15:55:22 +0100,
radisso...@gmx.de a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
> i am new on this list and in search for a place to
> ask for a wired problem with a devuan installation.
>
>
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 15:47:29 -0700
Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting John Crisp via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
>
> [snip much-appreciated picture of behind-the-scenes management
> folderol at Thunderbird Project:]
>
Thanks ;-) I have an alter ego that is on some lists as this ego (!)
got banned some
On 29/10/2020 13:44, Michael Neuffer wrote:
> On 10/29/20 2:27 PM, d...@d404.nl wrote:
--snip--
>> To ease the maintenance of those servers i intend to migrate them to
>> docker containers. I wonder people on this list have experience on this
>> subject?
>
>
> You might want to take a look at
On Thursday 29 October 2020 at 15:55:22, radisso...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> i am new on this list and in search for a place to
> ask for a wired problem with a devuan installation.
>
> Is this the place for that kind of questions ?
Yes.
Did you really mean a wired problem, or is it a
On 10/29/20 2:27 PM, d...@d404.nl wrote:
I do administer 3 different mailservers from which 1 does have the full
package from spf, dkim and dmarc. In my experience dmarc does not add
much of value but spf does. Dkim is much liked by isp's with strict spam
policies. But those are still reachable
Hi everyone,
i am new on this list and in search for a place to
ask for a wired problem with a devuan installation.
Is this the place for that kind of questions ?
re
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
Hi
> Would someone be able to outline for the unknowing what all actually
> is required? (I am very much wanting to get away from outside product
> that is selling me down the road - ie like the alphabet (soup)
> company!).
If you want to host your own email server you would need:
1 - a system
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 06:12:40 -0500, o1bigtenor wrote in message
:
> Greetings
>
> Found the list of MUA useful.
>
> The last time I went looking though - - - it seemed to me anyway that
> much more than just a MUA is needed for a complete system.
>
> Would someone be able to outline for the
On 29-10-2020 04:34, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Bernard Rosset via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):
>
>> It seems we're drifting away from the main subject.
>> Count me in!
> Roger that! Subject header tweaked.
>
>> ?
>> If your emails are being refused by others, including major email
>> hosters, I
On 2020-10-29 20:12, o1bigtenor via Dng wrote:
> Greetings
>
> Found the list of MUA useful.
>
> The last time I went looking though - - - it seemed to me anyway that
> much more than just a MUA is needed for a complete system.
>
> Would someone be able to outline for the unknowing what all
On Thursday 29 October 2020 at 12:12:40, o1bigtenor via Dng wrote:
> Greetings
>
> Found the list of MUA useful.
>
> The last time I went looking though - - - it seemed to me anyway that
> much more than just a MUA is needed for a complete system.
Please define "complete system".
I can't tell
Greetings
Found the list of MUA useful.
The last time I went looking though - - - it seemed to me anyway that
much more than just a MUA is needed for a complete system.
Would someone be able to outline for the unknowing what all actually
is required? (I am very much wanting to get away from
Adam Borowski wrote:
> -- and it's exclusively the former group that uses GPG. Thus, crap support
> in Thunderbird is not a problem for me -- I have yet to see a GPG-signed
> piece of mail.
>
not really...
15-20 years ago while working for a bank edp/it dpt, PGP was required
almost for half the
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 02:46:37PM +0900, Simon Walter wrote:
> On 2020-10-28 07:47, Rick Moen wrote:
> > I continue to like projects that are limited in feature scope enough to
> > not live or die by corporate underwriting. E.g., mutt continues to be
> > maintainable by a small group of
25 matches
Mail list logo
