Re: [DNG] Discovery #fail

Hi Steve, It's most likely a debian issue. And to be more precise, a Xorg that may not be up to date. I would advise you to check devuan's Xorg version and check if the firmware of your laptop is talked about on the internet. Ubuntu likely uses a more recent version of Xorg than debian, or any

[DNG] Discovery #fail

Greetings all, I've been a long time Devuan user, and have donated to the project because I would very much like to see it continue. I recently was forced to upgrade my laptop, having completely destroyed my old one, and upon installation (dual boot) of Beowulf 3.1.0 and reboot, was dropped

Re: [DNG] Beowulf installation skipped networking. Quickest fix? SOLVED

> Probably that is just dhcp. > If you want to see current settings > > sudo ifconfig (old command) > > Someone might post the 'new' command That would be `ip address show` Or `ip a` If you’re lazy :P https://baturin.org/docs/iproute2/ ___

Re: [DNG] Package Repository Issue

private/dng/attachments/20210327/126459bf/attachment.html> -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: publickey -g4...@protonmail.com - 0x42E94623.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 1852 bytes Desc: not available URL:<https://mailinglists.dyne.or

Re: [DNG] Beowulf installation skipped networking. Quickest fix? SOLVED

On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 17:28:37 +1030 dva...@internode.on.net wrote: > On 26.03.21 06:54, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:49:13 +1030 > > Have your tried juat rebooting with the ethernet cable plugged > > in? > > I probably should have, but on finding no mention of eth0 in the

Re: [DNG] Beowulf installation skipped networking. Quickest fix? SOLVED

On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 17:28:37 +1030 dva...@internode.on.net wrote: > On 26.03.21 06:54, Patrick Bartek wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:49:13 +1030 > > dva...@internode.on.net wrote: > > > > >  My shiny new Beowulf  3.0.0 install on an Intel NUC skipped > ethernet > > > stuff, perhaps

Re: [DNG] Default logins for ARM images?

On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 20:33:48 -0700 Gregory Nowak via Dng wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:30:45PM +0200, Lars Noodén via Dng wrote: > > I'm looking at an ARM image for Beowulf, but cannot find where the > > default password is annotated. It's not on either of these pages: > > > >

[DNG] adding raspi to sources.list

Hi all. I want to add: to my sources.list. However, this seems to be a dangling directory with no references to it in the package indexes. I've tried two forms in sources.list: deb http://deb.devuan.org/devuan pool/raspi/l/linux-raspi/

Re: [DNG] Package Repository Issue

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, March 27, 2021 10:37 PM, g4sra via Dng wrote: > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Saturday, March 27, 2021 8:06 PM, aitor wrote: > > > Hi Tony, > > > > On 27/3/21 19:24, Tony Thedford wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Seems to be an

Re: [DNG] Package Repository Issue

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, March 27, 2021 8:06 PM, aitor wrote: > Hi Tony, > > On 27/3/21 19:24, Tony Thedford wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Seems to be an issue on the package mirrors regarding i686 packages today. > > I get the following errors about a missing public

Re: [DNG] Default logins for ARM images?

I have tried to use the devuan_beowulf_3.1.0_armel_rpi0.img for my old Raspi. I have found a README.txt in https://arm-files.devuan.org with some credentials in it. But none of them was working. I do not know the user/password. I have mounted the memory card with the image on my desktop and

Re: [DNG] Package Repository Issue

Hi Tony, On 27/3/21 19:24, Tony Thedford wrote: Hello, Seems to be an issue on the package mirrors regarding i686 packages today. I get the following errors about a missing public key. Note that amd64 packages are working ok, do not have such errors. W: GPG error:

Re: [DNG] FSF and human rights

> On 27 Mar 2021, at 03:55, John Morris wrote: > > On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 15:46 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: >> >> I'd suggest nobody sign anything, and nobody respond to this email. >> >> If you believe that Stallman was removed, shunned and criticized >> because of guilt by association, then

[DNG] Package Repository Issue

Hello, Seems to be an issue on the package mirrors regarding i686 packages today. I get the following errors about a missing public key. Note that amd64 packages are working ok, do not have such errors. W: GPG error: http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged beowulf-security InRelease: The

Re: [DNG] FSF and human rights

Le 27/03/2021 à 13:30, Steve Litt a écrit : > Alexis PM via Dng said on Sat, 27 Mar 2021 09:23:21 + (UTC) > >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Debian is engaging in a disgusting attack against RMS: >>> https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_002 >>> >>> Does Devuan have resolutions to sign open letters? >>>

Re: [DNG] Remote two-way sound?

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Saturday, March 27, 2021 5:32 PM, Antony Stone wrote: > On Saturday 27 March 2021 at 17:29:56, tito via Dng wrote: > > > On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 16:36:46 +0100 Antony Stone wrote: > > > > > Does anyone know of a remote access mechanism which supports two-way

Re: [DNG] Remote two-way sound?

On Saturday 27 March 2021 at 17:29:56, tito via Dng wrote: > On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 16:36:46 +0100 Antony Stone wrote: > > > > Does anyone know of a remote access mechanism which supports two-way > > sound? > > Krdc (Kde remote desltop client) has a setting: > > Sound: on this computer / Remote

Re: [DNG] FSF and human rights

On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 17:50:07 +0100 Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 08:30:14 -0400, Steve wrote in message > <20210327083014.2b434...@mydesk.domain.cxm>: > > > Alexis PM via Dng said on Sat, 27 Mar 2021 09:23:21 + (UTC) > > > > > > Hi All, > > >> > > >> Debian is engaging in a

Re: [DNG] FSF and human rights

Fully shareable. Never before has freedom been under attack by the ideology of politically correct, by revisionism, by cancel culture. I am not an IT pro, but I fully believe in free software and I understand the danger that also surrounds this freedom and its supporters. Terrible. Let's not

Re: [DNG] FSF and human rights

On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 08:30:14 -0400, Steve wrote in message <20210327083014.2b434...@mydesk.domain.cxm>: > Alexis PM via Dng said on Sat, 27 Mar 2021 09:23:21 + (UTC) > > > > Hi All, > >> > >> Debian is engaging in a disgusting attack against RMS: > >>

Re: [DNG] Remote two-way sound?

On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 16:36:46 +0100 Antony Stone wrote: > Hi. > > I don't know if I'm just overlooking something obvious, but I can't > think of the answer... > > Does anyone know of a remote access mechanism which supports two-way > sound? > > I've deliberately worded that slightly vaguely,

Re: [DNG] Remote two-way sound?

Antony Stone writes: > The requirement is that I need to run applications expecting to have > access to microphone and speakers, and those are on my local machine, > not the remote one running the application/s. > Bandwidth is not a problem - [...] I've used netJACK1 for this in the past. On

[DNG] Remote two-way sound?

Hi. I don't know if I'm just overlooking something obvious, but I can't think of the answer... Does anyone know of a remote access mechanism which supports two-way sound? I've deliberately worded that slightly vaguely, because I'd be happy with a remote desktop sharing system such as RDC /

Re: [DNG] FSF and human rights

On 27/3/21 15:06, d...@d404.nl wrote: But I would like to keep politics*any politics except init freedom* as far as possible from Devuan All life is politics so I will not in any way connect my signing to the Devuan project. And I suggest others to do the same. I  replaced

Re: [DNG] FSF and human rights

On 26-03-2021 20:46, Steve Litt wrote: > Alessandro Vesely via Dng said on Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:07:08 +0100 > >> Hi All, >> >> Debian is engaging in a disgusting attack against RMS: >> https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_002 >> >> Does Devuan have resolutions to sign open letters? >> I'd propose

Re: [DNG] FSF and human rights

John Morris said on Fri, 26 Mar 2021 22:55:57 -0500 >On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 15:46 -0400, Steve Litt wrote: >> >> I'd suggest nobody sign anything, and nobody respond to this email. >> >> If you believe that Stallman was removed, shunned and criticized >> because of guilt by association, then

Re: [DNG] FSF and human rights

Alexis PM via Dng said on Sat, 27 Mar 2021 09:23:21 + (UTC) > > Hi All, >> >> Debian is engaging in a disgusting attack against RMS: >> https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_002 >> >> Does Devuan have resolutions to sign open letters? >> I'd propose to sign this one instead: >>

Re: [DNG] FSF and human rights

Steve Litt [26.03.2021 20:46]: > Before you sign anything or do anything, ask yourself if this is of top > importance to you. Are you willing to risk your career, your position > in your community, perhaps the positions of your family, to defend > Richard Stallman? Unless the answer is an

Re: [DNG] FSF and human rights

Hi, On 26/3/21 22:58, Riccardo Mottola via Dng wrote: A post, written by Hannah Wolfman-Jones, with a response from civil-rights expert Nadine Strossen, former president of the ACLU. https://www.wetheweb.org/post/cancel-we-the-web I can only stand with this letter. Me too. Btw, quoting

Re: [DNG] FSF and human rights

>>Hi All, >> >>Debian is engaging in a disgusting attack against RMS: >>https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_002 >> >>Does Devuan have resolutions to sign open letters? >>I'd propose to sign this one instead: >>https://rms-support-letter.github.io/ > > I'd suggest nobody sign anything,

Re: [DNG] FSF and human rights

> Hi All, > > Debian is engaging in a disgusting attack against RMS: > https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_002 > > Does Devuan have resolutions to sign open letters? > I'd propose to sign this one instead: > https://rms-support-letter.github.io/ > > See also: > An orthodox analysis entitled

Re: [DNG] Beowulf installation skipped networking. Quickest fix? SOLVED

On 26.03.21 06:54, Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 15:49:13 +1030 > dva...@internode.on.net wrote: > > >  My shiny new Beowulf  3.0.0 install on an Intel NUC skipped ethernet > > stuff, perhaps because the ethernet cable wasn't inserted at the time? > > > > Now, I can start hacking

Re: [DNG] Default logins for ARM images?

On 3/27/21 5:33 AM, Gregory Nowak via Dng wrote: > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 12:30:45PM +0200, Lars Noodén via Dng wrote: >> I'm looking at an ARM image for Beowulf, but cannot find where the >> default password is annotated. It's not on either of these pages: >> >>

Re: [DNG] Dng Subscription results

On 3/26/21 4:54 PM, Dimitris via Dng wrote: [snip] > for mailman it might also be possible to just send an email to > dng-j...@lists.dyne.org Thanks. That helped. Regards, Lars OpenPGP_0xDEF20AB6653CEAE7.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital