Re: [DNG] devuan gitea broken?

2021-09-24 Thread tito via Dng
On Sat, 25 Sep 2021 08:45:50 +1000 Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 21:39:01 +0200 > tito wrote: > > > On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 09:57:59 +1000 > > Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > > > > > This one turned out to be that someone (aka me) had mistakenly > > > raised a blanket

Re: [DNG] devuan gitea broken?

2021-09-24 Thread Ralph Ronnquist via Dng
On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 21:39:01 +0200 tito wrote: > On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 09:57:59 +1000 > Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > > > This one turned out to be that someone (aka me) had mistakenly > > raised a blanket traffic blockage as a misdirected response to an > > apparent DoS effect via gitea

Re: [DNG] devuan gitea broken?

2021-09-24 Thread tito via Dng
On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 09:57:59 +1000 Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > This one turned out to be that someone (aka me) had mistakenly raised a > blanket traffic blockage as a misdirected response to an apparent DoS > effect via gitea accesses. Things should be better now, at least until I > have

Re: [DNG] Living Dangerously (was: Review of documentation needed)

2021-09-24 Thread spiralofhope
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:16:21 + g4sra via Dng wrote: > A rookie sysadmin mistake is to take backups but never ever do a test > restore to ensure they are OK. Can confirm. I had a backup persistency file which felt "old" when I tried using it. Backups seemed to be going impressively fast;