Re: [DNG] Another problem you won't have without Systemd (or separate oomd)

On Sat, 2022-08-20 at 10:20 +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Hi! > > You cannot make this up, can you? > > Bug 2119518 - GNOME being OOM killed during basic use on VM with 2G of > RAM > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119518 Martin, after reading this, I think it's not a bug

Re: [DNG] Another problem you won't have without Systemd (or separate oomd)

Hi, Martin Steigerwald writes: > Hi! > > You cannot make this up, can you? > > Bug 2119518 - GNOME being OOM killed during basic use on VM with 2G of > RAM > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119518 Reading through the bug report it looks a lot like someone got their maths wrong. I

[DNG] Another problem you won't have without Systemd (or separate oomd)

Hi! You cannot make this up, can you? Bug 2119518 - GNOME being OOM killed during basic use on VM with 2G of RAM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119518 It still seems to be that people think adding complexity comes without risk of malfunction. oomd may make sense in certain clo