On 09.08.20 02:31, terryc wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Aug 2020 00:33:00 -0500
> John Morris wrote:
>
> Snipping the Pol, Para and not mentioning Cap.
>
>> Or like people who still run Windows after
>> decades of failure and breathtaking security flaws, but they just know
>> the next release is going to
On 12.06.20 13:02, d...@d404.nl wrote:
> On 12-06-2020 12:49, Riccardo Mottola via Dng wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I just upgraded from ascii to beowulf a pretty decent laptop, equipped
>> with a core i7 and 8GB of RAM.
>>
>> I upgraded everything in place: so same desktop environment, same
>>
Hi,
would it be possible to use github comments or a seperate mailing list
for Netman?
Some days it feels like this is the Netman Mailing list and Devuan is a
little sub project of Netman.
I would be very happy if we find a solution for this issue.
--
Kind regards
Patrick Erdmann
XMPP/Mail
On 09.08.2015 12:02, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
Mark S Bilk m...@cosmicpenguin.com writes:
It seems to me that it's good to have shim programs that satisfy
dependencies of apps on systemd, each shim performing some systemd
function. Here's why:
Suppose there are 10,000 application programs
On 17.07.2015 11:25, Stephanie Daugherty wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 1:50 AM James Powell james4...@hotmail.com
mailto:james4...@hotmail.com wrote:
There is one thing I would recommend different that the standard
Debian model. Release only the right amount of packages to create a
In my experience pulse should be optional. It works. Not good but it
does what its made for (after years of development). But avahi is
unstable... Does not work for me. I often had this problem: Network was
not reachable, because of avahi.
On 01.04.2015 21:33, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
On Wed, Apr
On 20.02.2015 12:54, Aldemir Akpinar wrote:
BTW I think nobody here cares about having Devuan support Gnome.
The do-it-all DEs,
those providing their own integrated replacement for every
application, are, by design,
opposed to the Nix principles. It is not a
+1 for this pragmatic approach.
On 14.02.2015 11:30, Jaromil wrote:
hi Jack, Isaac,
On Fri, 13 Feb 2015, Jack L. Frost wrote:
That's because by default X tries to hotplug input devices with evdev.
And evdev requires libudev. There is a evdev fork that works with
libsysdev tho:
On 12.02.2015 15:35, Steve Litt wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 06:21:00 +
KatolaZ kato...@freaknet.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 07:33:51AM +0200, Martijn Dekkers wrote:
[cut]
Whilst I am still utterly amazed with how awesome Linux servers
are, I don't think we will ever get there
