On Oct 21, 2017 10:05, "Dr. Nikolaus Klepp" wrote:
> Tobias, until I read your posting a couple of days ago I did not realise
> that UEFI/Secure Boot can be configured such that ONLY my kernels can be
> booted, not even fresh install media from the vendor. Thank you very much.
>
> Arnt
Well, tha
before UEFI, right?
Not before the OS was up with all its drivers.
With UEFI I can boot straight from the RAIDs in my machines. I used to
need a separate HDD on a non-RAID controller for that.
>> > * UEFI allows for more security with secure boot. E.g. my thinkpad
>> > *only* boo
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Then maybe I misunderstood the reason for EFI.
UEFI is a huge step forward in pretty much all areas and makes booting
both simpler and more powerful.
Grub on BIOS basically works like this: the one MBR is read by BIOS
and executed (512 byt
Hi Laurent,
Am 31.08.2015 9:24 nachm. schrieb "Laurent Bercot" :
>
> On 31/08/2015 20:56, Tobias Hunger wrote:
>>
>> Oh, I am pretty happy with systemd and won't lie about that. I would
>> still like to see some competition going.
>
>
> That
Am 31.08.2015 21:50 schrieb "KatolaZ" :
> The sole fact that you consider anything else than systemd as "a
> lesser" option[...]
Hi KatolaZ,
there are several inits (plus surrounding code like startup scripts) that
do not require a hack like that. Systemd is just one of those and I am
fully aware
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 7:40 PM, Jaromil wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2015, Tobias Hunger wrote:
>
>> > if that is even a legitimate account,
>>
>> Yes. Did we get to the point where we need fake emails to follow up
>> on free software projects now?
>
> since no
-mode in earnest;-)
Best Regards,
Tobias
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Tobias Hunger wrote:
> Hi Jaromil,
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Jaromil wrote:
>>>Hi Rainer, do you know that you are feeding a troll ?
>>>tobias.hun...@gmail.com appears to be a systemd d
Hi Jaromil,
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:32 PM, Jaromil wrote:
>>Hi Rainer, do you know that you are feeding a troll ?
>>tobias.hun...@gmail.com appears to be a systemd developer
I tend to send patches to open source projects that I get into contact
with. It is a really annoying habit I picked up i
Hi Rainer,
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Rainer Weikusat
wrote:
> 'su' is a somewhat generic setuid-0 program: It changes the uid and the
> gids associated with itself to the ones for a certain user and then
> executes a shell. In addition to that, it contains another "random
> environment mun
Am 29.08.2015 10:26 vorm. schrieb "tilt!" :
> My wording was biased there. To put it in clear terms:
>
> I think it's wrong that nodm attempts to (re)start an interactive
> X session when the system is already scheduled for shutdown.
>
> I find it wrong, because it is misleading the user into inter
Hi tilt!,
Am 29.08.2015 07:53 schrieb "tilt!" :
> thanks a lot for these hints! Please understand the following questions
not
> directed specifically to you, it's just that I am not very much into
systemd,
> and i appreciate every piece of clarification a lot. I post this here,
because
> this is o
Hi tilt!
The systemd 217 announcement contained something about utmp support being
compile time optional to have legacy free systems. So I would not depend on
that service.
I do not think you would need it anyway as systemd will stop the display
manager all by itself.
Best Regards,
Tobias
__
Hi Edward,
In your place I'd stick with what I am comfortable with and let the
packages figure out how to get things into distributions, especially after
jaromils message.
But if you decide to go for a C++ frontend, then you might want to consider
Qt. It is probably a more beginner friendly optio
13 matches
Mail list logo
