On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 21:46:05 +0200
"tilt!" wrote:
> I agree with Laurent, the RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK rule weight should
> be lowered below treshhold, because
>
> 1. it's incorrect to mark a mail as spam solely based on this
> criterion, because a significant portion of internet users are
> in
> My address sometimes gets blocked as coming from a dynamically
> assigned IP address, even though the IP address is a static address.
Okay, that's odd. But what could the ISP do about it?
> list services that use PBL are not a good idea and serve the interests
> that are exactly opposite to the
Hi,
On 08/22/2015 09:18 PM, Laurent Bercot wrote:
On 22/08/2015 17:20, Timo Buhrmester wrote:
[...] the fact that these days, MTAs behind dynamic IPs are
>> automatically suspicious.
Well, it always helps to make the list host aware that list services
that use PBL are not a good idea, and
On 22/08/2015 17:20, Timo Buhrmester wrote:
I wouldn't quite take this personally, and I doubt anyone on the list
is to blame for that, with the possible exception of yourself for not
arranging yourself around the fact that these days, MTAs behind
dynamic IPs are automatically suspicious.
Well
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 05:20:15PM +0200, Timo Buhrmester wrote:
> > > from my legitimate IP
> > 0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
> >[82.216.6.62 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
> Note the 'dynamic'.
>
> I wouldn't quite take this
> > from my legitimate IP
> 0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
>[82.216.6.62 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
Note the 'dynamic'.
I wouldn't quite take this personally, and I doubt anyone on the list is to
blame for that, with the po
On 22/08/2015 16:58, Laurent Bercot wrote:
Spam detection software, running on the system "tupac2",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administra
Spam detection software, running on the system "tupac2",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content prev
