Quoting Go Linux (goli...@yahoo.com):
> Here's another one:
>
> http://judecnelson.blogspot.com/2014/09/systemd-biggest-fallacies.html
Yes, I know that one and think it's OK, but it's a great deal longer and
is metadiscussion. Not the same category of piece at all.
I appreciate the UbuntuBSD p
On Fri, 7/29/16, Rick Moen wrote:
Subject: Re: [DNG] A nice summary about what's bad about SystemD
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Date: Friday, July 29, 2016, 1:32 PM
Quoting Marlon Nunes (nu...@openmailbox.org):
>> https://www.ubuntubsd.org/wiki:why_not_systemd
>>
>> 12 p
Quoting Marlon Nunes (nu...@openmailbox.org):
> https://www.ubuntubsd.org/wiki:why_not_systemd
>
> 12 points about why its bad.
I like this a lot because it's concise, very clear, and non-ranty.
Actually, I've been looking for a while for a single-stop place to refer
people to, and can't recal
On Fri, 29 Jul 2016, Marlon Nunes wrote:
> https://www.ubuntubsd.org/wiki:why_not_systemd
>
> 12 points about why its bad.
very good read. I never considered point 3 really. Makes sense and
indeed is quite worrying to imagine the consequences:
> Since systemd is very tightly welded with the Li
On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 09:02:22 -0300, Marlon wrote in message
<84cee18669768451a14d662b41d5e...@openmailbox.org>:
> https://www.ubuntubsd.org/wiki:why_not_systemd
>
> 12 points about why its bad.
..I disagree with #12, the SystemD people knows perfectly well what
they wanna use SystemD for, they
https://www.ubuntubsd.org/wiki:why_not_systemd
12 points about why its bad.
--
Stop slacking you lazy bum!
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
