Rainer Weikusat wrote:
A more accurate summary would be "Fedora is not yet switching
to wayland as default for 24".
It is, but even though who knows. Ubuntu had been planning to
switch to the "bananager" since 2010 [1] till Mir appeared
in 2013.
[1]:
mitt_gr...@riseup.net writes:
> Fedora is switching back to X11 in 24:
> https://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2016/03/04/why-wayland-anyway/
A more accurate summary would be "Fedora is not yet switching to wayland
as default for 24".
Entertaining read:
Fedora is switching back to X11 in 24:
https://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2016/03/04/why-wayland-anyway/
Mitt
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
Hendrik Boom writes:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 10:06:18PM +, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>>
>> ssh -X is basically 'straight X' but with the protocol traffic
>> transparently forwarded over the SSH connection and some convenience
>> features like "setting up a suitable
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 10:06:18PM +, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>
> ssh -X is basically 'straight X' but with the protocol traffic
> transparently forwarded over the SSH connection and some convenience
> features like "setting up a suitable DISPLAY" and
> "handling MIT magic cookie
2016-03-06 21:33 GMT+01:00, Rainer Weikusat :
> Not at all, actually. VNC based on keeping two bitmapped displays in
> sync by sending by sending 'bitmap updates' from the remote machine to
> 'the local display'. Even in a LAN environment (disclaimer: Haven't used
>
Simon Hobson writes:
[...]
> Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>
>>> Is that what I get with ssh -X? I've noticed it's sometimes quite klunky.
>>
>> ssh -X is basically 'straight X' but with the protocol traffic
>> transparently forwarded over the
Teodoro Santoni wrote:
>> What did they replace X11 forwarding with? (I shudder to ask)
>
> Nothing afaik.
That would be the "we don't use it, therefore we don't care if anyone else uses
it - we'll just declare it broken behaviour and drop it" approach to backwards
Hendrik Boom writes:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 08:33:46PM +, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
>> Teodoro Santoni writes:
>> > 2016-03-06 18:23 GMT+01:00, Steve Litt :
>> >> What did they replace X11 forwarding with? (I shudder to
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 08:33:46PM +, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Teodoro Santoni writes:
> > 2016-03-06 18:23 GMT+01:00, Steve Litt :
> >> What did they replace X11 forwarding with? (I shudder to ask)
> >
> > Nothing afaik.
> > Some people are
2016-03-06 18:23 GMT+01:00, Steve Litt :
> What did they replace X11 forwarding with? (I shudder to ask)
Nothing afaik.
Some people are enabling VNC for wayland compositors though.
They are very akin technologies.
___
Dng
On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 15:13:36 +0100
Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 04:57:16PM +0300, Mitt Green wrote:
> >ask it. What's wrong with Wayland? I never used
>
> As far as I know Wayland doesn’t support TCP connections anymore, so
> you don’t have
On Sun, 06 Mar 2016 16:57:16 +0300
Mitt Green wrote:
> This question is long-standing, but I forget to
> ask it. What's wrong with Wayland? I never used
> it, except for a couple of broken Fedora Live
> sessions, when everything freezes.
>
> Mitt
From what I understand,
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 04:57:16PM +0300, Mitt Green wrote:
ask it. What's wrong with Wayland? I never used
As far as I know Wayland doesn’t support TCP connections anymore, so you
don’t have X11 forwarding anymore.
So for me Wayland is useless.
Shade and sweet water!
Stephan
--
This question is long-standing, but I forget to
ask it. What's wrong with Wayland? I never used
it, except for a couple of broken Fedora Live
sessions, when everything freezes.
Mitt
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
15 matches
Mail list logo