On 20.12.17 10:08, Edward Bartolo wrote:
> Bundling various functionalities associated with an OS with an init,
> is a subtle way of 'encouraging' users to stick with that 'init'.
That seems overly kind to an obvious effort to create an M$-like monolith
which is too expensive time-wise to adapt to
On Wed, 20 Dec 2017, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 19/12/2017 à 18:08, Michael Siegel a écrit :
> > The point I was trying to make there, was that the way the article
> > states those facts is misleading, not that they are actually untrue. It
> > just really provokes the question "So, why use Devuan at
On 20/12/2017, Didier Kryn wrote:
> Le 19/12/2017 à 18:08, Michael Siegel a écrit :
>> The point I was trying to make there, was that the way the article
>> states those facts is misleading, not that they are actually untrue. It
>> just really provokes the question "So, why use Devuan at all?" in
On 20/12/2017, Edward Bartolo wrote:
>
> I suspect (paranoia?) that the whole point of writing the article was
> precises to give this misleading message i.e. Devuan is an unnecessary
> fork.
>
Errata: 'precises' should be 'precisely'
> Systemd is changing this concept into something similar to
Le 19/12/2017 à 18:08, Michael Siegel a écrit :
The point I was trying to make there, was that the way the article
states those facts is misleading, not that they are actually untrue. It
just really provokes the question "So, why use Devuan at all?" in kind
of a strange way. And as a whole, it gi
Am 19.12.2017 um 10:23 schrieb Jaromil:
>
> dear Michael,
>
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2017, Michael Siegel wrote:
>
>> 1.
>> The intro paragraph says:
>> "Erklärtes Ziel ist es, nicht den umstrittenen systemd-Dienst als
>> 'init'-Prozess fest vorzugeben, sondern die Wahl des init-Prozesses dem
>> Anwende
dear Michael,
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017, Michael Siegel wrote:
> 1.
> The intro paragraph says:
> "Erklärtes Ziel ist es, nicht den umstrittenen systemd-Dienst als
> 'init'-Prozess fest vorzugeben, sondern die Wahl des init-Prozesses dem
> Anwender zu überlassen und ein möglichst breites Spektrum an
>
You understand German pretty well,
It is time to correct the Wiki on all issues concerning Devuan.
I can only guess what kind of fanboy wrote the Wiki on this
issue.
I better remain silent on this.
Bye
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mail
Hi there,
I have just discovered an article on Devuan in the German Wikipedia today:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devuan
While that article is more extensive than the one in the English
version, it has some serious flaws that should be addressed in one or
another way.
1.
The intro paragraph sa