On 1/27/21 10:43 PM, Bruce Perens via Dng wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 11:30 AM wrote:
>> On 2021-01-27 12:51, Lars Noodén via Dng wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> Which licenses are relevant for contributing wallpapers to the distro?
>>>
>>> Would CC BY-ND [1] be the most appropriate, for
Not a problem. Everyone should feel free to write me directly when they
have questions.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 1:14 PM wrote:
> Thank you Bruce. You noticed how I sidestepped answering that question.
> Sadly, the finer points of licensing has never sunk in despite the
> informative
Thank you Bruce. You noticed how I sidestepped answering that question.
Sadly, the finer points of licensing has never sunk in despite the
informative interactions we've had with you over the years . . .
golinux
On 2021-01-27 14:43, Bruce Perens wrote:
CC ND and CC BY NC ND would have to go
CC ND and CC BY NC ND would have to go in the non-free section.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 11:30 AM wrote:
> On 2021-01-27 12:51, Lars Noodén via Dng wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Which licenses are relevant for contributing wallpapers to the distro?
> >
> > Would CC BY-ND [1] be the most
On 2021-01-27 12:51, Lars Noodén via Dng wrote:
Greetings,
Which licenses are relevant for contributing wallpapers to the distro?
Would CC BY-ND [1] be the most appropriate, for photos? What about CC
BY-NC-ND [2] or is there an established license already chosen?
/Lars
[1]
Greetings,
Which licenses are relevant for contributing wallpapers to the distro?
Would CC BY-ND [1] be the most appropriate, for photos? What about CC
BY-NC-ND [2] or is there an established license already chosen?
/Lars
[1] https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/
[2]
