On 07/12/2018 07:02, Simon Hobson wrote:
> I reckon I managed a better uptime than Microsoft with their Office
> 359 service ;-)
LOL
--
Mark Rousell
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/d
Rick Moen wrote:
> I heartily second your thanks to the mailing list administration team.
+1
Having run mail & list servers I've seen the problems caused by the big outfits
who are happy to just declare "oh that's no longer valid - we don't care about
breaking it". And I reckon I managed a bet
Quoting Jaromil (jaro...@dyne.org):
> many thanks for following up and taking care of this issue!! and to
> golinux, rrq and others for the list administration.
I heartily second your thanks to the mailing list administration team.
Sorry about one partially garbled sentence. Here's that paragra
dear Rick,
On Thu, 06 Dec 2018, Rick Moen wrote:
> As of today, the esteemed Dng listadmins have made a small tweak
> to Mailman's operation, and have asked me to explain the change.
> _No_ action is required on your end.
many thanks for following up and taking care of this issue!! and to
golin
As of today, the esteemed Dng listadmins have made a small tweak
to Mailman's operation, and have asked me to explain the change.
_No_ action is required on your end.
tl;dr: Mailman will now munge the From: address if and only if the
sender's domain publishes a problematic DMARC policy, to substi
