Re: [DNG] First steps on possible runit package

2017-10-29 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 12:11:08PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > One more thing. I *VERY* strongly believe that installing one init > system should not deinstall another init system. You mean, systemd vs systemd-sysv, sysvinit vs sysvinit-core? -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Laws we want back: Poland, Dz.U. 1921

Re: [DNG] First steps on possible runit package

2017-10-29 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com): > Also, while I have your attention, all you guys talk about two > different packages: runit and runit-init. Upstream distinction, not distro. runit-init is a binary executable that can be the first process. Or, if you prefer, you can use your

Re: [DNG] First steps on possible runit package

2017-10-29 Thread Steve Litt
On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 11:38:39 +0100 Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 06:00:35AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I wrote to runit author Gerrit Pape about his vision of how runit > > should be implemented, and also the supervision list with a couple

Re: [DNG] First steps on possible runit package

2017-10-29 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 06:00:35AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > Hi all, > > I wrote to runit author Gerrit Pape about his vision of how runit > should be implemented, and also the supervision list with a couple > questions. Hopefully, when I get a partner to do the actual packaging, > it will go

[DNG] First steps on possible runit package

2017-10-29 Thread Steve Litt
Hi all, I wrote to runit author Gerrit Pape about his vision of how runit should be implemented, and also the supervision list with a couple questions. Hopefully, when I get a partner to do the actual packaging, it will go fairly quickly. SteveT Steve Litt October 2017 featured book: Rapid