..excellent, talk to your support staff, they are paid handsomely
precisely to help/support you.
I'm one of them, but I've got other tasks than managing theses servers.
And I'm sure that the answer will be "we have too much urgent work to
care about your geekeries". FYI, I'm one of the very
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 12:23:59 +1100
Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
> Hmm, I understood
>
> http://www.trek.eu.org/devel/sysd2v/sysd2v-0.2.sh
>
> to be the code,
Yep, that's it, and the code looks pretty good to me. And it looks very
useful for what we've been discussing. Thanks Ralph!!!
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 20:35:42 -0600
goli...@devuan.org wrote:
> Even though I agree that we should never have been forced to reinvent
> a wheel that wasn't broken, I have no problem with co-existence. But
> the systemd cabal might not want to share. Will be interesting to see
> if at some point
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:48:13 +0100, Stephane wrote in message
<1179-8fb9-d4ad-4d34-70ad26abf...@univ-paris1.fr>:
> > .nope, dunno those .eml files, only tried this with digests, and you
> > wanna do one at the time even in scripts to avoid messing up your
> > email archive with malformed
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 08:35:42PM -0600, goli...@devuan.org wrote:
> Even though I agree that we should never have been forced to reinvent a
> wheel that wasn't broken, I have no problem with co-existence. But the
> systemd cabal might not want to share. Will be interesting to see if at some
>
Even though I agree that we should never have been forced to reinvent a
wheel that wasn't broken, I have no problem with co-existence. But the
systemd cabal might not want to share. Will be interesting to see if at
some point those unit files are locked down in a way that prevents the
Hmm, I understood
http://www.trek.eu.org/devel/sysd2v/sysd2v-0.2.sh
to be the code, and that it's about to be included in the sysvinit package.
If it works well enough, it'll be a handy tool for init script writers, even
though it implicitly validates the existence of something the world
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 13:28:00 -0500
"Ismael L. Donis Garcia" wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From:
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 1:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [DNG] Formail for managing digests
>
>
> > More fiddling while Rome burns
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 12:18:55 -0600
goli...@devuan.org wrote:
> More fiddling while Rome burns . . . sigh . . .
>
> I'm in a bit of a mood because I thought that a script to convert
> systemd units to init style shell scripts would be worthy of at least
> some discussion.
>
> golinux
Well
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: [DNG] Formail for managing digests
More fiddling while Rome burns . . . sigh . . .
I'm in a bit of a mood because I thought that a script to convert systemd
units to init style shell scripts
More fiddling while Rome burns . . . sigh . . .
I'm in a bit of a mood because I thought that a script to convert
systemd units to init style shell scripts would be worthy of at least
some discussion.
golinux
___
Dng mailing list
think that digest as a method of mail group delivery should be dead
Sympa can be set to generate digests as a compilation of individual
mails, joined via Mime. So if you do the things right, you can answer
the mail with its headers.
--
Sincerely, Stephane Ascoet
.nope, dunno those .eml files, only tried this with digests, and you
wanna do one at the time even in scripts to avoid messing up your email
archive with malformed messages lurking in your digests.
DIGEST="Dng Digest, Vol 62, Issue 31.eml" ; cat "$DIGEST" |formail -ds
or
DIGEST="Dng Digest, Vol
On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 09:42:41 +0100, Stephane wrote in message
<6dc8e46d-4448-adcc-dc98-943226524...@univ-paris1.fr>:
> Arnt Karlsen:
>
> > ..you can't (AFAIK), you do it outside your MUA, with e.g.:
> > 'cat $DIGEST |formail +1 -ds procmail '
>
> HI, yes, it was clear that it couldn't be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On 27/11/19 7:42 pm, Stephane Ascoet wrote:
> Arnt Karlsen:
>
>> ..you can't (AFAIK), you do it outside your MUA, with e.g.: 'cat
>> $DIGEST |formail +1 -ds procmail '
>
> HI, yes, it was clear that it couldn't be done graphically in
>
Arnt Karlsen:
..you can't (AFAIK), you do it outside your MUA, with e.g.:
'cat $DIGEST |formail +1 -ds procmail '
HI, yes, it was clear that it couldn't be done graphically in
Thunderbird. The first thing I don't understand is what I must have
behind $DIGEST? The digest saved as an .eml
16 matches
Mail list logo
