On April 26, 2016 2:37:42 AM GMT+09:00, KatolaZ wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:36:44PM +0100, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
>> kato...@freaknet.org writes:
>> >Seeing that 90% of free software uses autohell I guess it might be
>not
>> >so ugly :)
>>
>> That's the Microsoft Windows argument: "Seei
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:36:44PM +0100, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> kato...@freaknet.org writes:
> >Seeing that 90% of free software uses autohell I guess it might be not
> >so ugly :)
>
> That's the Microsoft Windows argument: "Seeing that 90% use windows
> it can't be so bad".
>
My comment was
Arnt Gulbrandsen writes:
> kato...@freaknet.org writes:
>> Seeing that 90% of free software uses autohell I guess it might be not
>> so ugly :)
>
> That's the Microsoft Windows argument: "Seeing that 90% use windows it
> can't be so bad".
FWIW: Countering "the KDE project uses ..., hence ..." wit
kato...@freaknet.org writes:
Seeing that 90% of free software uses autohell I guess it might be not
so ugly :)
That's the Microsoft Windows argument: "Seeing that 90% use windows it
can't be so bad".
Arnt
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
htt
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:17:23AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:59:54AM +0200, aitor_czr wrote:
> >
> > On 04/25/2016 06:44 AM, Mitt Green wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> > >CMake is written in C++, too, and is big and slow.
> > >It's even worse than Autohell.
> > >
> > >Sorry for my
On 04/25/2016 12:17 PM, KatolaZ wrote:
>On 04/25/2016 06:44 AM, Mitt Green wrote:
[cut]
> >CMake is written in C++, too, and is big and slow.
> >It's even worse than Autohell.
> >
> >Sorry for my allergy to cee plus plus. It spreads
> >to HTML emails, too.
>
>Autohell vs Cmake once again.
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 11:59:54AM +0200, aitor_czr wrote:
>
> On 04/25/2016 06:44 AM, Mitt Green wrote:
[cut]
> >CMake is written in C++, too, and is big and slow.
> >It's even worse than Autohell.
> >
> >Sorry for my allergy to cee plus plus. It spreads
> >to HTML emails, too.
>
> Autohell
On 04/25/2016 06:44 AM, Mitt Green wrote:
Here you are an example about how to build a
>gtkmm application using cmake:
[...]
Hey,
Let me put my two cents in. I wouldn't be using
both gtkmm and CMake. GTK+ by itself is not
very beautiful (glib), GTK+3 just sucks, but
gtkmm implements this usi
aitor_czr wrote:
> Here you are an example about how to build a
> gtkmm application using cmake:
[...]
Hey,
Let me put my two cents in. I wouldn't be using
both gtkmm and CMake. GTK+ by itself is not
very beautiful (glib), GTK+3 just sucks, but
gtkmm implements this using C++.
CMake is writ
Hi all,
Here you are an example about how to build a gtkmm application using cmake:
www.gnuinos.org/PrintPDF
This is the same example as:
https://developer.gnome.org/gtkmm-tutorial/3.20/gtkmm-tutorial.html#sec-printing-example
including some changes in the code. I'll explain them later.
The
10 matches
Mail list logo