Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com):
> Can I ask all of you something? How do people, who call themselves
> developers, joyfully embrace a false choice like systemd vs sysvinit?
The same way that the more-vocal djbware fans, and Prof. Bernstein
himself, compared qmail _only_ with sendm
Am Donnerstag, 26. Juli 2018 schrieb Steve Litt:
> [...]
> Can I ask all of you something? How do people, who call themselves
> developers, joyfully embrace a false choice like systemd vs sysvinit?
> Do these same "developers" neglect to put in error handling for a bad
> value, because the program
On Thursday 26 July 2018 at 17:16:56, Эльбрус Кондратьев wrote:
> It's called 'herd behavior'. Someone told them that systemd constituted
> 'the way to go'. Nevermind if that way results irrational.
Oh well, at least it wasn't Hurd behaviour, otherwise we wouldn't have an
Operating System at all
It's called 'herd behavior'. Someone told them that systemd constituted
'the way to go'. Nevermind if that way results irrational.
Regards
On Thu, 2018-07-26 at 10:49 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 07:13:52 -0400
> Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
> > I found this article online.
> >
> >
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 07:13:52 -0400
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> I found this article online.
>
> https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/debian-without-systemd-devuan/
I could have swapped the phrase "s6 plus s6-rc" for "systemd" and that
entire video would have been true except the part that says if you're
usi
I found this article online.
https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/debian-without-systemd-devuan/
It doesn't really get into the problems with systemd, unfortunately.
-- hendrik
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mai
