Re: [DNG] simple-netaid for daedalus

Hi, On 11/9/22 9:36, Joel Roth via Dng wrote: Well, for now I'll open a request-for-packaging bug with debian and we can see if someone steps up. Thanks, Joel! Can you provide a link to the sources? They are in gitea.devuan.dev: https://git.devuan.dev/aitor_czr/libnetaid

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid for daedalus

On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 10:43:25AM +0200, aitor wrote: > Hi Joel, > > On 10/9/22 8:36, Joel Roth via Dng wrote: > > I tried downloading and installing the packages one-by-one. > > Had some dependency problems (no details, sorry it was a > > while back.) Anyway not sure which packages are

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid for daedalus

Hi Joel, On 10/9/22 8:36, Joel Roth via Dng wrote: I tried downloading and installing the packages one-by-one. Had some dependency problems (no details, sorry it was a while back.) Anyway not sure which packages are relevant, for example do I need the cdk and vte3 versions? Yes, you need to

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid for daedalus

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 02:17:56AM +0200, aitor wrote: > Hi Joel, > > On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 23:33:00 +0700 > Joel Roth via Dng wrote: > > > Great that you're working on a new architecture for this program. > > Since upgrading to daedalus, I noticed that my old sn didn't > > work properly. I

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid for daedalus

Hi Joel, On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 23:33:00 +0700 Joel Roth via Dng wrote: Great that you're working on a new architecture for this program. Since upgrading to daedalus, I noticed that my old sn didn't work properly. I didn't investigate further but have been looking to install a newer version.

[DNG] simple-netaid for daedalus

Hi Aitor, Great that you're working on a new architecture for this program. Since upgrading to daedalus, I noticed that my old sn didn't work properly. I didn't investigate further but have been looking to install a newer version. Currently apt-cache search netaid shows: simple-netaid-vte3 -

Re: [DNG] Simple-netaid 1-0 released

Hi, On 12/2/21 1:40 AM, aitor wrote: I'm doing some changes in libnetaid in order to get it working with static IP addresses. Done. The following commit: https://gitea.devuan.dev/aitor_czr/libnetaid/commit/18602a475048741b06a504832f14100d167f2728

Re: [DNG] Simple-netaid 1-0 released

Hi again, On 11/30/21 10:10 PM, aitor wrote: Hi fraser, On 11/30/21 12:23 PM, fraser kendall wrote: Very nice tool. So far doing everything I expected it to do, and doing it reliably and quickly. Thank you. Thank you very much for taking the time to test it! I'm doing some changes in

Re: [DNG] Simple-netaid 1-0 released

Hi fraser, On 11/30/21 12:23 PM, fraser kendall wrote: Very nice tool. So far doing everything I expected it to do, and doing it reliably and quickly. Thank you. Thank you very much for taking the time to test it! Aitor. ___ Dng mailing list

Re: [DNG] Simple-netaid 1-0 released

On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 12:47:24 +0100 aitor wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just uploaded the packages of simple-netaid (libnetaid + snetaid > + simple-netaid-cdk) to the repository of gnuinos chimaera. If you > want to install them in devuan, Very nice tool. So far doing everything I expected it to

Re: [DNG] Simple-netaid 1-0 released

En 20 de noviembre de 2021 22:01:18 Steve Litt escribió: aitor said on Sat, 20 Nov 2021 12:47:24 +0100 but keep in mind that first you'll need to stop the previous instance via "service snetaid stop" because libnetaid doesn't admit multiple instances of snetaid so far. Why would anyone

Re: [DNG] Simple-netaid 1-0 released

aitor said on Sat, 20 Nov 2021 12:47:24 +0100 >but keep in mind that first you'll need to stop the previous instance >via "service snetaid stop" because libnetaid doesn't admit multiple >instances of snetaid so far. Why would anyone want multiple instances of snetaid? SteveT Steve Litt

Re: [DNG] Simple-netaid 1-0 released

Hi Tito, Top posting from my mobile... You need to add the following stanzas to /etc/network/interface (this is valid for dynamic ip addresses): allow-hotplug iface inet dhcp Ralph Ronnquist wrote some tips about how to configure ifupdown in dev1galaxy, i think. You can also search the

Re: [DNG] Simple-netaid 1-0 released

On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 12:47:24 +0100 aitor wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just uploaded the packages of simple-netaid (libnetaid + snetaid + > simple-netaid-cdk) to the repository > of gnuinos chimaera. If you want to install them in devuan, first you'll need > to install the gnupg key of gnuinos: >

[DNG] Simple-netaid 1-0 released

Hi all, I've just uploaded the packages of simple-netaid (libnetaid + snetaid + simple-netaid-cdk) to the repository of gnuinos chimaera. If you want to install them in devuan, first you'll need to install the gnupg key of gnuinos:

Re: [DNG] Simple-netaid

On 9/2/20 17:25, Aitor wrote: std::shared pointers in combination with std::weak pointers std::shared_ptr and std::weak_ptr pointers, i mean ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

[DNG] Simple-netaid (was: download image ISO of beowulf)

Hi, On 1/2/20 13:52, Aitor wrote: In the meantime, i'm finishing simple-netaid. BTW, i'm pushing the new code of simple-netaid to gitlab: https://git.devuan.org/aitor_czr/simple-netaid.git Simple-netaid now uses some smart pointers like:     std::unique_ptr foo( new Foo( args ) ); even

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

Hi Didier, En 12 de junio de 2019 7:40:08 Didier Kryn escribió: sizeof() is not a real function. Its syntax makes it look like a function but it is not. Its argument can be either a variable or a type (which no function can have). It is evaluated at compile time - which is equivalent to

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

Le 11/06/2019 à 20:40, Steve Litt a écrit : On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:01:53 +0100 s@po wrote: On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:34:54 +0100 (BST) Jim Jackson wrote: sizeof() is calculated by the compiler, not at run time. The code generated would be the same. Hello Jim, Indeed it his, my point was

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 22:07:22 +0100 (BST) Jim Jackson wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, Steve Litt wrote: > > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:01:53 +0100 > > s@po wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:34:54 +0100 (BST) > > > Jim Jackson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > sizeof() is calculated by

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, Steve Litt wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:01:53 +0100 > s@po wrote: > > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:34:54 +0100 (BST) > > Jim Jackson wrote: > > > > > > > > sizeof() is calculated by the compiler, not at run time. The code > > > generated would be the same. > > >

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

On Tuesday 11 June 2019 at 20:40:09, Steve Litt wrote: > It's funny. So many times people advocate jumping through hoops to save > a millisecond in a program operated by and therefore bottlenecked by a > 100wpm typist. 100wpm is 500 keystrokes per minute, If I may pick a nit, I think it makes

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:01:53 +0100 s@po wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:34:54 +0100 (BST) > Jim Jackson wrote: > > > > > sizeof() is calculated by the compiler, not at run time. The code > > generated would be the same. > > Hello Jim, > Indeed it his, my point was only a observation,

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

Le 10/06/2019 à 20:20, s@po a écrit : One harmfull situation is when you pass an array[n] to a function has an argument, for example.. Usign 'sizeof' inside, will return the size of the pointer and not the size of elements on the array..     It is a "beginner's" error to confuse the size of

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:58:35 +0200 Didier Kryn wrote: > Le 10/06/2019 à 16:01, s@po a écrit : > > On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:34:54 +0100 (BST) > > Jim Jackson wrote: > > > >> sizeof() is calculated by the compiler, not at run time. The code > >> generated would be the same. > > Hello Jim, > >

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

Le 10/06/2019 à 16:01, s@po a écrit : On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:34:54 +0100 (BST) Jim Jackson wrote: sizeof() is calculated by the compiler, not at run time. The code generated would be the same. Hello Jim, Indeed it his, my point was only a observation, that if size is fixed, no need to

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:34:54 +0100 (BST) Jim Jackson wrote: > > sizeof() is calculated by the compiler, not at run time. The code > generated would be the same. Hello Jim, Indeed it his, my point was only a observation, that if size is fixed, no need to calculate it at compile time, the

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

On Sat, 8 Jun 2019, s@po wrote: > On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 08:31:49 + > aitor_czr wrote: > > Hello aitor, > > > > > Look at the "netstat.c" file again. I'm using > > > > status = fgets ( buffer, sizeof(buffer), fp ); > > > > instead :) > > > > Aitor. > > > > > > I understood that, from

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

On Sat, 1 Jun 2019 08:31:49 + aitor_czr wrote: Hello aitor, > > Look at the "netstat.c" file again. I'm using > > status = fgets ( buffer, sizeof(buffer), fp ); > > instead :) > > Aitor. > > I understood that, from the beguining.. :) You don't need the 'sizeof *buffer', since you

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

Hi s@, On 20/5/19 22:41, s@ wrote: aitor_czr wrote: Have a look at the server side: https://git.devuan.org/aitor_czr/simple-netaid/blob/master/backend_src/server.c char buffer[512]; (...) You are using in some places 'sizeof(buffer)' in 'fgets()' and such.. Your buffer has a fixed size..

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

On Sun, 19 May 2019 11:38:52 +0200 Hello aitor, aitor_czr wrote: > Have a look at the server side: > > https://git.devuan.org/aitor_czr/simple-netaid/blob/master/backend_src/server.c char buffer[512]; (...) You are using in some places 'sizeof(buffer)' in 'fgets()' and such.. Your buffer has

[DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

Aitor wrote: "We must think on the devuan project, we hate narcissism :)" Narcissism is a delusion; there is nothing to like about it. During youth it prevents sufferers from identifying their weaknesses lowering their chances of success. I am using my version not to stroke my ego; that need to

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

Hi Edward, On 15/5/19 13:10, Edward Bartolo via Dng wrote: Hi Aitor, I, like many other Devuan users, hope that the last crises is over and that it will never happen again. The purpose of replying to your thread is to ask why you are rewriting the backend from the very beginning. I started

[DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

Hi Aitor, I, like many other Devuan users, hope that the last crises is over and that it will never happen again. The purpose of replying to your thread is to ask why you are rewriting the backend from the very beginning. Needless to state, I am still using my version of simple-netaid with its

[DNG] simple-netaid from scratch

Hi all, I recently started started developing the backend of simple-netaid from scratch. There will be a lot of improvements. You can find the project here: https://git.devuan.org/aitor_czr/simple-netaid/tree/master/ The readme file will contain all the documentation about usage of the CLI

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid tips

On 23/3/19 10:34, aitor_czr wrote: The backbone of the shared library is a small part of the iproute project remaining the rest of the project in order to enable the accessibility to the "iproute show" command without root privileges. Oops..., "ip route show" can be run without root

[DNG] simple-netaid tips

Hi, I'll try to document how the backend of simple-netaid works. First of all, please take in mind that this project was started by another person (Edward Bartolo) with a very different point of view, but helding out an inspiration for mine. So, take this thread as a positive feedback for the

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

Hi, On 17/3/19 13:38, aitor_czr wrote: Hi Eward, On 7/3/19 8:38, Edward Bartolo via Dng wrote: Hi Everyone, My version of simple-netaid-backend has been debugged to connect when there is only one active wifi hotspot. It was previously failing to connect because there was an error in a

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

Hi, On 17/3/19 16:04, aitor_czr wrote: Hi Tom, On 17/3/19 14:38, wirelessd...@gmail.com wrote: I'm also working on an alternative to poettering's ifplugd for the automatically wired connect option of simple-netaid. Aitor. Can you borrow code from netplug for that? It does the same as

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

Hi Tom, On 17/3/19 14:38, wirelessd...@gmail.com wrote: I'm also working on an alternative to poettering's ifplugd for the automatically wired connect option of simple-netaid. Aitor. Can you borrow code from netplug for that? It does the same as ifplugd. —Tom I knew netplug, but i

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

> I'm also working on an alternative to poettering's ifplugd for the > automatically wired connect option of simple-netaid. > > Aitor. > Can you borrow code from netplug for that? It does the same as ifplugd. —Tom___ Dng mailing list

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

Hi again, On 17/3/19 13:38, aitor_czr wrote: Hi Eward, On 7/3/19 8:38, Edward Bartolo via Dng wrote: Hi Everyone, My version of simple-netaid-backend has been debugged to connect when there is only one active wifi hotspot. It was previously failing to connect because there was an error in

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

Hi Eward, On 7/3/19 8:38, Edward Bartolo via Dng wrote: Hi Everyone, My version of simple-netaid-backend has been debugged to connect when there is only one active wifi hotspot. It was previously failing to connect because there was an error in a while loop which prevented iteration from

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

On 08/03/19 at 01:34, Rick Moen wrote: > 'netstat -nalp' is hard-wired into my memory, whereas I have to look up > the 'ss' equivalent, every time.   You're lucky, as the ss equivalent of netstat -nalp is ss -nalp! -n, --numeric Do not try to resolve service names. -a, --all Display both

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

On 08/03/19 at 16:30, Bot Fap wrote: > > > On Fri, 8 Mar 2019, 00:10 Alessandro Selli, > wrote: > > On 08/03/19 at 00:50, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > > > > It's intriguing to see you get so emotional about this. > > >   My objections are

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

On 08/03/19 at 05:26, terryc wrote: > On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 22:05:39 +0100 > Alessandro Selli wrote: > >> On 07/03/19 at 21:22, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: >>> Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 6:49 am:   Next improvement would be using current commands (ip and iw) in place of the

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

On 2019-03-07 19:49, Alessandro Selli wrote: Next improvement would be using current commands (ip and iw) in place of the obsolete and deprecated ones, i.e. ifconfig and iwconfig: ifconfig and iwconfig being depracted or obsolete is questionable at best. They work, get security patches if

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 22:05:39 +0100 Alessandro Selli wrote: > On 07/03/19 at 21:22, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > > Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 6:49 am: > >>   Next improvement would be using current commands (ip and iw) in > >> place of the obsolete and deprecated ones, i.e. ifconfig

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

Quoting Ralph Ronnquist via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org): > It's intriguing to see you get so emotional about this. I obviously would not presume to speak for Allesandro, but sometimes people get frustrated in Internet arguments in ways they might not in more-interactive discussion. (Anyway, I'd

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

On 08/03/19 at 01:19, Rick Moen wrote: > Quoting Alessandro Selli (alessandrose...@linux.com): > > Allesandro, my friend, over many years on the Internet, I've found that > certain discussions are best concluded with amicable production of the > set of facts that all present (within reason; and my

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

So you ask a question just so you can spit on me? Really, boy, you should have a chat with your shrink. Ralph. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

Quoting Alessandro Selli (alessandrose...@linux.com): > You accused me of intentions I never had, and are still failing at > providing with technical reasons why obsolete, nearly unmaintained, > universally deprecated and way outdated commands are to still be used > today when they do not offer

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

On 08/03/19 at 01:09, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 10:56 am: >>   Please tell us.  When you need to do firewalling, what do you use and why? >> 1) ipfwadm >> 2) ipchains >> 3) iptables > I assume you ask me specifically.   No, I'm asking you generically. >

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 12:56:53AM +0100, Alessandro Selli wrote: >   Please tell us.  When you need to do firewalling, what do you use and why? > > 1) ipfwadm > > 2) ipchains > > 3) iptables An interesting example you made here... -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Have you accepted Khorne as your

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

On 08/03/19 at 00:50, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > > It's intriguing to see you get so emotional about this.   My objections are technically motivated and documented.   Yours are neither. > Just the other week I opted for using ifconfig because I couldn't work > out the single command for

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 10:56 am: >   Please tell us.  When you need to do firewalling, what do you use and why? > 1) ipfwadm > 2) ipchains > 3) iptables I assume you ask me specifically. In most hypotheticals I care to imagine, I would use iptables, because I believe I know it well

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

On 07/03/19 at 23:26, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 9:04 am: >>   I did not write they are useless.  I wrote that they are obsolete and >> deprecated. > > Yes. And those terms are badly chosen, because they are neither.   Please tell us.  When you need to do

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 9:48 am: >> I believe > >   Technical matters are not a matter of belief. > >> I objected to our choice of words, > >   You "believe" things you did?  Don't you even know why yourself did > and said things? > >> and not your reasons for >> insisting on using

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

On 07/03/19 at 23:26, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > > Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 9:04 am: >>   I did not write they are useless.  I wrote that they are obsolete and >> deprecated. > > Yes. And those terms are badly chosen, because they are neither.   They are both, and I explained why

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

(Hey, we've had this discussion at least once before.) Quoting Ralph Ronnquist via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org): > The terms "obsolete" and "deprecated" are badly chosen, since the > programs ifconfig and iwconfig are neither. You may well have your > reasons to like other programs to achieve the

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 9:04 am: >   I did not write they are useless.  I wrote that they are obsolete and > deprecated. Yes. And those terms are badly chosen, because they are neither. >> They work well without >> needing constant development; security patches are good. > >   They

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 07:22:37AM +1100, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 6:49 am: > >   Next improvement would be using current commands (ip and iw) in place > > of the obsolete and deprecated ones, i.e. ifconfig and iwconfig: > > The terms "obsolete" and

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

On 07/03/19 at 22:18, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > > Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 8:05 am: >> On 07/03/19 at 21:22, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: >>> Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 6:49 am:   Next improvement would be using current commands (ip and iw) in place of the obsolete

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 8:05 am: > On 07/03/19 at 21:22, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: >> Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 6:49 am: >>>   Next improvement would be using current commands (ip and iw) in place >>> of the obsolete and deprecated ones, i.e. ifconfig and iwconfig: >> The

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

On 07/03/19 at 21:22, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote: > Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 6:49 am: >>   Next improvement would be using current commands (ip and iw) in place >> of the obsolete and deprecated ones, i.e. ifconfig and iwconfig: > The terms "obsolete" and "deprecated" are badly chosen,

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 6:49 am: >   Next improvement would be using current commands (ip and iw) in place > of the obsolete and deprecated ones, i.e. ifconfig and iwconfig: The terms "obsolete" and "deprecated" are badly chosen, since the programs ifconfig and iwconfig are neither. You

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

On 07/03/19 at 08:38, Edward Bartolo via Dng wrote: > It uses instead ifconfig, iwconfig, wpa_supplicant and > dhclient.   Next improvement would be using current commands (ip and iw) in place of the obsolete and deprecated ones, i.e. ifconfig and iwconfig:

[DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

Hi Everyone, My version of simple-netaid-backend has been debugged to connect when there is only one active wifi hotspot. It was previously failing to connect because there was an error in a while loop which prevented iteration from taking place when there was only one active wifi hotspot.

[DNG] simple netaid, connman, and Wicd

On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 07:56:38AM +0200, J. Fahrner wrote: > > Is there some README about simple-netaid? What is it? Is it a > replacement for wicd? Can they live together, or must wicd removed? > What's the difference between the two? I guess I could ask the same questions about "Connman UI

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-gtk is comming soon

Hi again, El 21/07/18 a las 11:44, aitor_czr escribió: Here you are an example about how to use this library in a C code file: /***  BEGIN  **/ #include int main() {     netstat *ns; // struct defined in netstat.h     ns = g_new0(netstat, 1);    

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-gtk is comming soon

Hi Edward, ... and sorry for my delay. El 09/07/18 a las 17:44, Edward Bartolo escribió: Aitor, aitor whose netaid is going to be preferred? I'll follow working on the same backend you started and using also some services of ifup, ifdown..., but a shared library would simplify the code a

[DNG] simple-netaid-gtk is comming soon

Aitor, aitor whose netaid is going to be preferred? What did you do to the 'infamous' SUID backend? Did you add functions to it? Have you completely revamped it with completely new code and a different algorithms? I say 'Sorry' to Devuan for being absent almost regularly but at the moment I am

[DNG] simple-netaid-gtk is comming soon

Hi all, I recently pushed the latest sources of simple-netaid-gtk, adding some features to the backend: https://git.devuan.org/aitor_czr/simple-netaid-gtk/tree/master You will need to install some packages like libgtkmm-3, libiw-dev, ethtool, isc-dhcp-client, cmake... Just run the

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-gtk

Hi again, On 09/10/2016 09:33 AM, aitor_czr wrote: Hi, On 09/09/2016 11:58 PM, aitor_czr wrote: Hi, I'm working again in the frontend of simple-netaid. It works, but i'm trying to apply custom widgets to it, and i get some bugs. I'm subscribed in the gtkmm-l...@gnome.org, but replais to

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-gtk

Hi, On 09/09/2016 11:58 PM, aitor_czr wrote: Hi, I'm working again in the frontend of simple-netaid. It works, but i'm trying to apply custom widgets to it, and i get some bugs. I'm subscribed in the gtkmm-l...@gnome.org, but replais to the questions are still pending... Cheers,

[DNG] simple-netaid-gtk

Hi, I'm working again in the frontend of simple-netaid. It works, but i'm trying to apply custom widgets to it, and i get some bugs. I'm subscribed in the gtkmm-l...@gnome.org, but replais to the questions are still pending... Cheers, Aitor.

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid/netman connection info

Hi fsmithred, Quote: "Is the connection information in simple-netaid/netman still stored under /etc/network/wifi, or has that changed?" Yes, /etc/network/wifi is still used to store wifi connection information. The files will still store eth0 and wlan0 as network devices. These are substituted

[DNG] simple-netaid/netman connection info

Is the connection information in simple-netaid/netman still stored under /etc/network/wifi, or has that changed? I haven't kept up with that, and I need to know for refractasnapshot, as there is an option to include or exclude network settings when making the snapshot. -fsr

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-gtk3

Hi Boruch, On 04/17/2016 10:10 PM, Boruch Baum wrote: I'd be game to try it. 1] What are its design goals, and what deficiency in other options (eg package 'wi-cd') is it trying to address? Simple-netaid-gtk3 uses the backend of simple-netaid. 2] Is there a packaged

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-gtk3

On 04/17/2016 12:45 PM, Edward Bartolo wrote: Hi, I looks quite elaborate, well done. Edward On 16/04/2016, aitor_czr wrote: >Hi all, > >I'm advancing with simple-netaid-gtk3. You can download the following >video: > >wgethttp://gnuinos.org/simple-netaid-gtk3/snetaid

Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-gtk3

On 04/16/2016 01:22 PM, aitor_czr wrote: > I'm advancing with simple-netaid-gtk3. You can download the following > video: > > wget http://gnuinos.org/simple-netaid-gtk3/snetaid I'd be game to try it. 1] What are its design goals, and what deficiency in other options (eg package 'wi-cd') is it

[DNG] simple-netaid-gtk3

Hi all, I'm advancing with simple-netaid-gtk3. You can download the following video: wget http://gnuinos.org/simple-netaid-gtk3/snetaid Cheers, Aitor. ___ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org