Re: [DNG] Upgrades to testing... Is DebianBug#864043 relevant to us?

2017-06-13 Thread Tom Cassidy
On 10 June 2017 at 22:37, Hendrik Boom wrote: > This is in response to a bug on the Debian documenation mailing list, > but I'm replying to Devuan instead because some of it may be relevant > here. > > I'm particularly concerned by the sentence at the end: > > > But I

Re: [DNG] Upgrades to testing... Is DebianBug#864043 relevant to us?

2017-06-10 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 03:37:04PM +0100, KatolaZ wrote: > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 08:37:26AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > > This is in response to a bug on the Debian documenation mailing list, > > but I'm replying to Devuan instead because some of it may be relevant > > here. > > > > I'm

Re: [DNG] Upgrades to testing... Is DebianBug#864043 relevant to us?

2017-06-10 Thread KatolaZ
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 08:37:26AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > This is in response to a bug on the Debian documenation mailing list, > but I'm replying to Devuan instead because some of it may be relevant > here. > > I'm particularly concerned by the sentence at the end: > > > But I haven't

[DNG] Upgrades to testing... Is DebianBug#864043 relevant to us?

2017-06-10 Thread Hendrik Boom
This is in response to a bug on the Debian documenation mailing list, but I'm replying to Devuan instead because some of it may be relevant here. I'm particularly concerned by the sentence at the end: > But I haven't heard anybody claiming to have > done any bug-free upgrades, so it's hard to