Suggests pretty much throw in the kitchen sink, and most of the time I don't
see how they relate to the parent package, so off seems like the best default.
Most of the time recommends are useless but not every time. Like with firefox
having ca-certificates as a 'recommended' package.
Maybe a de
On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 23:04:25 +0200
Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:36:23AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > A case in point is asciidoc. It's used to generate HTML pages and
> > books. To do books it recommends other sofftware that takes about
> > a gigabyte on disk. Now the D
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:36:23AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> A case in point is asciidoc. It's used to generate HTML pages and
> books. To do books it recommends other sofftware that takes about a
> gigabyte on disk. Now the Docbook stuff and the LaTeX stuff are
> necessary for producing
On Mon, 01 Aug 2016 14:48:30 +0100
Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Daniel Reurich writes:
> > Why are we dragging up a thread from over a year ago??
> >
> > I strongly disagree, installing "Recommends" are IMHO reasonable
> > for the common case, and that should stay the default except where
> > the us
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 07:38:07AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 01:55:57PM +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> > Why are we dragging up a thread from over a year ago??
> >
> > I strongly disagree, installing "Recommends" are IMHO reasonable for the
> > common case, and that sho
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 04:25:35PM +0200, Jaromil wrote:
[cut]
>
> What is feasible to do and comes out of this thread is to nurture the
> documentation about this setting and perhaps aim to add an option in
> Ascii about deactivating recommends: and suggests: . OTOH, inside
> derivatives like D
On Mon, 01 Aug 2016, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Daniel Reurich writes:
> > Why are we dragging up a thread from over a year ago??
> >
> > I strongly disagree, installing "Recommends" are IMHO reasonable
> > for the common case, and that should stay the default except where
> > the user wants to mai
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 02:48:30PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Daniel Reurich writes:
> > Why are we dragging up a thread from over a year ago??
> >
> > I strongly disagree, installing "Recommends" are IMHO reasonable for the
> > common case, and that should stay the default except where the u
Daniel Reurich writes:
> Why are we dragging up a thread from over a year ago??
>
> I strongly disagree, installing "Recommends" are IMHO reasonable for the
> common case, and that should stay the default except where the user
> wants to maintain a really minimal system,
The usually 'recommended'
On 08/01/2016 01:55 AM, Daniel Reurich wrote:
>
> I think it may be useful to add a question into the installer about this
> (probably only in expert mode) rather than blindly change the current
> setting. Where we are rebuilding packages we could certainly review and
> potentially reclassify rec
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 01:55:57PM +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> Why are we dragging up a thread from over a year ago??
>
> I strongly disagree, installing "Recommends" are IMHO reasonable for the
> common case, and that should stay the default except where the user
> wants to maintain a really m
Hi
Why are we dragging up a thread from over a year ago??
I strongly disagree, installing "Recommends" are IMHO reasonable for the
common case, and that should stay the default except where the user
wants to maintain a really minimal system, and is prepared to have to
install everything not an ex
Hi Nextime,
On 07/31/2016 02:00 PM, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI
wrote:
Franco Lanza wrote:
>Personally on debian i was using from date
>
>APT:Install-Recommends "0";
>APT:Install-Suggests "0";
>
>in all my install apt.conf.
>
>I don't like apt downloading and installing things that are not require
On 07/31/2016 02:20 PM, Paweł Cholewiński wrote:
>
> First law of software quality picture from nixcraft ..
>
Oh, they even provided a line of examples :)
BTW, I thought this suggests/recommends set to false were already agreed
upon, so +1 here. (Sorry I didn't take the time to read the whole th
W dniu 31.07.2016 o 13:47, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI pisze:
On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 00:36:22 +0200
Franco Lanza wrote:
Personally on debian i was using from date
APT:Install-Recommends "0";
APT:Install-Suggests "0";
in all my install apt.conf.
I don't like apt downloading and installing things that a
On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 00:36:22 +0200
Franco Lanza wrote:
> Personally on debian i was using from date
>
> APT:Install-Recommends "0";
> APT:Install-Suggests "0";
>
> in all my install apt.conf.
>
> I don't like apt downloading and installing things that are not required
> but just recommended or
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 07:43:26PM -0500, T.J. Duchene wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Franco Lanza [mailto:next...@nexlab.it]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 5:36 PM
> > To: dng@lists.dyne.org
> > Subject: [Dng] What do you guys t
On 04/03/2015 01:28 PM, Anto wrote:
>
> The login form seems to support the synchronisation with Gitlab account,
> which I also already registered a few months back. But I got nginx 404
> error when I clicked on "with Gitlab".
>
*** The single-sign-on with Gitlab requires a Gitlab setting which I
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 09:40:41PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
[cut]
>
> Note that for a minimal dependencies default, the options to
> apt-get are not ideal. We have these two options related to
> the dependency graph.
>
>--no-install-recommends
>Do not consider recommended pac
On 04/04/15 09:40, Joel Roth wrote:
Note that for a minimal dependencies default, the options to
apt-get are not ideal. We have these two options related to
the dependency graph.
--no-install-recommends
Do not consider recommended packages as a dependency for installing.
On Fri 03 April 2015 21:40:41 Joel Roth wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 08:18:29AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 12:36:22AM +0200, Franco Lanza wrote:
> > > Personally on debian i was using from date
> > >
> > > APT:Install-Recommends "0";
> > > APT:Install-Suggests "0";
> > >
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 08:18:29AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 12:36:22AM +0200, Franco Lanza wrote:
> > Personally on debian i was using from date
> >
> > APT:Install-Recommends "0";
> > APT:Install-Suggests "0";
> >
> > in all my install apt.conf.
> >
> > I don't like apt d
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 12:36:22AM +0200, Franco Lanza wrote:
> Personally on debian i was using from date
>
> APT:Install-Recommends "0";
> APT:Install-Suggests "0";
>
> in all my install apt.conf.
>
> I don't like apt downloading and installing things that are not required
> but just recommend
On Fri, 4/3/15, Anto wrote:
Subject: Re: [Dng] What do you guys think about "Suggest" and "Recommends"
dependency?
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Date: Friday, April 3, 2015, 11:28 AM
On 03/04/15 01:53, hellekin wrote:
> Oh, did I just announce the Devuan forum?
You did
On 03/04/15 01:53, hellekin wrote:
Oh, did I just announce the Devuan forum?
You did! And I just registered myself there.
The login form seems to support the synchronisation with Gitlab account,
which I also already registered a few months back. But I got nginx 404
error when I clicked on
On 03/04/15 00:36, Franco Lanza wrote:
Personally on debian i was using from date
APT:Install-Recommends "0";
APT:Install-Suggests "0";
in all my install apt.conf.
I don't like apt downloading and installing things that are not required
but just recommended or suggested, expecially in server o
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Franco Lanza wrote:
> Personally on debian i was using from date
>
> APT:Install-Recommends "0";
> APT:Install-Suggests "0";
+1
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
> -Original Message-
> From: Franco Lanza [mailto:next...@nexlab.it]
> Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 5:36 PM
> To: dng@lists.dyne.org
> Subject: [Dng] What do you guys think about "Suggest" and "Recommends"
> dependency?
>
> Personally on d
On 04/02/2015 07:36 PM, Franco Lanza wrote:
> Personally on debian i was using from date
>
> APT:Install-Recommends "0";
> APT:Install-Suggests "0";
>
> What do you think if we make this the default in devuan?
>
*** +1. I'm all for minimalism in Devuan, and encouraging people to use
Blends for e
I'm all for it. If there are a set of packages that usually get installed
together, we can create a metapackage for them.
-Jude
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Franco Lanza wrote:
> Personally on debian i was using from date
>
> APT:Install-Recommends "0";
> APT:Install-Suggests "0";
>
> in al
Personally on debian i was using from date
APT:Install-Recommends "0";
APT:Install-Suggests "0";
in all my install apt.conf.
I don't like apt downloading and installing things that are not required
but just recommended or suggested, expecially in server or embedded
envs, but also on my desktop.
31 matches
Mail list logo
