Re: [DNG] Why I don't want to have Pöttersoft on my system

2017-04-18 Thread Didier Kryn
Le 17/04/2017 à 16:54, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult a écrit : On 17.04.2017 16:37, Joachim Fahrner wrote: Am 2017-04-17 11:18, schrieb Klaus Ethgen: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5644 No further comment needed. Have fun

Re: [DNG] Why I don't want to have Pöttersoft on my system

2017-04-17 Thread Joachim Fahrner
Am 2017-04-17 17:11, schrieb goli...@dyne.org: "maybe handover dev of this toy to someone with unix experience" LOL! My favourite rant was from Linus Torvalds: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/04/05/torvalds_sievers_dust_up/ Jochen ___ Dng

Re: [DNG] Why I don't want to have Pöttersoft on my system

2017-04-17 Thread Steve Litt
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 16:37:29 +0200 Joachim Fahrner wrote: > Am 2017-04-17 11:18, schrieb Klaus Ethgen: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5644 > > > > No further comment needed. > > > > Have fun reading.

Re: [DNG] Why I don't want to have Pöttersoft on my system

2017-04-17 Thread golinux
On 2017-04-17 11:22, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote: On 17.04.2017 17:11, goli...@dyne.org wrote: The best response submitted to this bug has been removed but I saved it and posted to #devuan. Poster was Buzzsomething: "maybe handover dev of this toy to someone with unix

Re: [DNG] Why I don't want to have Pöttersoft on my system

2017-04-17 Thread Arnt Gulbrandsen
Aldemir Akpinar writes: It also has the grand finale: poettering locked and limited conversation to collaborators 2 hours ago Makes sense. Nothing new was being said, just old stuff repeated, and the bug was fixed three weeks ago. Arnt ___ Dng

Re: [DNG] Why I don't want to have Pöttersoft on my system

2017-04-17 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 17.04.2017 17:11, goli...@dyne.org wrote: > The best response submitted to this bug has been removed but I saved it > and posted to #devuan. Poster was Buzzsomething: > > "maybe handover dev of this toy to someone with unix experience" Ah, that explains why lennart closed the comments.

Re: [DNG] Why I don't want to have Pöttersoft on my system

2017-04-17 Thread golinux
On 2017-04-17 04:18, Klaus Ethgen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5644 No further comment needed. Have fun reading. (Found on popular fefe blog) Regards Klaus The best

Re: [DNG] Why I don't want to have Pöttersoft on my system

2017-04-17 Thread Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
On 17.04.2017 16:37, Joachim Fahrner wrote: > Am 2017-04-17 11:18, schrieb Klaus Ethgen: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5644 >> >> No further comment needed. >> >> Have fun reading. (Found on popular fefe blog) > > ROTFL > >

Re: [DNG] Why I don't want to have Pöttersoft on my system

2017-04-17 Thread Joachim Fahrner
Am 2017-04-17 11:18, schrieb Klaus Ethgen: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5644 No further comment needed. Have fun reading. (Found on popular fefe blog) ROTFL Stupid question: why does systemd implement a rm command? They sold us

Re: [DNG] Why I don't want to have Pöttersoft on my system

2017-04-17 Thread Aldemir Akpinar
On 17 April 2017 at 12:18, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5644 > > No further comment needed. > > Have fun reading. (Found on popular fefe blog) > > Regards >Klaus > - -- > Klaus

Re: [DNG] Why I don't want to have Pöttersoft on my system

2017-04-17 Thread Dan Purgert
On 04/17/2017 06:59 AM, Dan Purgert wrote: > bwah!? > > How does one not know that rm will tell you off if you try to do > something daft like rm -rf ? > > I mean, yeah, maybe it was a pitfall a few decades ago, when computers > were handled by "trained professionals" ... > > On 04/17/2017

Re: [DNG] Why I don't want to have Pöttersoft on my system

2017-04-17 Thread Dan Purgert
bwah!? How does one not know that rm will tell you off if you try to do something daft like rm -rf ? I mean, yeah, maybe it was a pitfall a few decades ago, when computers were handled by "trained professionals" ... On 04/17/2017 05:18 AM, Klaus Ethgen wrote: >

[DNG] Why I don't want to have Pöttersoft on my system

2017-04-17 Thread Klaus Ethgen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/5644 No further comment needed. Have fun reading. (Found on popular fefe blog) Regards Klaus - -- Klaus Ethgen http://www.ethgen.ch/ pub 4096R/4E20AF1C