Re: [DNG] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity - Two options that can be used in concert or separately.

2017-08-01 Thread nisus
Thank you Mr. Rankin for saying this. Bruce Perens blocked me* (also calling me a "fool" later to a 3rd party) after I started to brainstorm the defenses that would be raised about a week or two ago: letting everyone in the world know what he thought of me for mentioning laches etc. Such talk

Re: [DNG] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity.

2017-07-29 Thread Narcis Garcia
El 29/07/17 a les 16:12, Antony Stone ha escrit: > On Saturday 29 July 2017 at 13:55:54, ni...@redchan.it wrote: > >> It has come to my attention that some entities are claiming that you, >> dear Linux Hackers, (1)need to go through some foundation or get some >> permission from upon high in-order

Re: [DNG] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity.

2017-07-29 Thread Antony Stone
On Saturday 29 July 2017 at 13:55:54, ni...@redchan.it wrote: > It has come to my attention that some entities are claiming that you, > dear Linux Hackers, (1)need to go through some foundation or get some > permission from upon high in-order to sue the progenitors of GRSecurity Example? Antony

[DNG] Yes you have standing to sue GRSecurity.

2017-07-29 Thread nisus
It has come to my attention that some entities are claiming that you, dear Linux Hackers, (1)need to go through some foundation or get some permission from upon high in-order to sue the progenitors of GRSecurity for their violation of section 6 of the terms underwhich the linux kernel is distri