Re: [DNG] many packages VS. one package, was: Re: dng@lists.dyne.org

2015-07-18 Thread Didier Kryn
Le 18/07/2015 06:58, Peter Olson a écrit : On July 17, 2015 at 11:38 PM Gregory Nowak g...@gregn.net wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 08:16:06PM -0700, James Powell wrote: Some might ask, Why not just one simple package? That's where Devuan can bring packaging sanity in as well. megabyte for

Re: [DNG] many packages VS. one package, was: Re: dng@lists.dyne.org

2015-07-17 Thread Peter Olson
On July 17, 2015 at 11:38 PM Gregory Nowak g...@gregn.net wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 08:16:06PM -0700, James Powell wrote: Some might ask, Why not just one simple package? That's where Devuan can bring packaging sanity in as well. megabyte for example. Granted, this may not be

[DNG] many packages VS. one package, was: Re: dng@lists.dyne.org

2015-07-17 Thread Gregory Nowak
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 08:16:06PM -0700, James Powell wrote: I never said it was set in stone. All I suggested was if you install a package like SDL, then you install all of SDL, not just part of it. This reduces overhead of making multiple packages, simplifies the distribution, and makes