Re: [DNG] nlmon

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 05:17:30PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote: > Isaac Dunham writes: > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:21:04PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote: > >> Isaac Dunham writes: > >> > Or you can do it with mount, sudo, sh, and nlmon > >> > (http://git.r-36.net/nlmon). > >> > >> Using poll

Re: [DNG] nlmon

Isaac Dunham writes: > On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:21:04PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote: >> Isaac Dunham writes: >> > Or you can do it with mount, sudo, sh, and nlmon >> > (http://git.r-36.net/nlmon). >> >> Using poll to wait for a message followed by recvmsg for reading it >> offers (in absence

Re: [DNG] nlmon (was: A better default windows manager)

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:21:04PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote: > Isaac Dunham writes: > > Or you can do it with mount, sudo, sh, and nlmon > > (http://git.r-36.net/nlmon). > > Using poll to wait for a message followed by recvmsg for reading it > offers (in absence of a timeout) no advantages o

[DNG] nlmon (was: A better default windows manager)

Isaac Dunham writes: > Or you can do it with mount, sudo, sh, and nlmon (http://git.r-36.net/nlmon). Using poll to wait for a message followed by recvmsg for reading it offers (in absence of a timeout) no advantages over just doing a blocking recv. Since this code neither uses control messages no