ael writes:
I am happy with that. Just as long as one can enable it when
*necessary*.
You have a compiler and building is easy.
What is unacceptable is for Devuan to take away the freedom to read
email or prevent communication with devices which cannot be updated.
Keep in mind that
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 01:27:33PM +0200, Alessandro Selli wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 at 13:24:36 +0200
> Alessandro Selli wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 at 11:56:46 +0100
> > ael wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Devuan needs to
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 at 13:24:36 +0200
Alessandro Selli wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 at 11:56:46 +0100
> ael wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Devuan needs to avoid importing this problem.
>
> It also needs to avoid been labelled as an
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 at 11:56:46 +0100
ael wrote:
[...]
> Devuan needs to avoid importing this problem.
It also needs to avoid been labelled as an unsafe distro, one of the few¹
to still support unsecure protocols. After all, TLS v. 2.0 is from 1995,
quite a
The Debian maintainer of openssl has unilaterally decided to disable TLS
1.0 and 1.1 with no option to re-enable.
This breaks situations where users have no access to or influence on servers
which still (unfortunately) use these old protocols.
One case is offlineimap and there is a thread on the