dear Steve,
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When Irrwahn mentioned that cups needed depoetterization
I would really prefer if we avoid such a... "personalising neologism"
lets talk about systemd?
we all need to continue working to avoid personal attacks. If we don't
do t
On Fri, 12 Jun 2015 17:31:10 +0100
Matthew Melton wrote:
>
>
> Steve Litt wrote
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > When Irrwahn mentioned that cups needed depoetterization, my first
> > thought was "what in the world does cups need with systemd? And
> > then I realized the problem.
> >
> > Like
Hi Steve,
So, if we code up a dummy sd_notify to interface replace the one from
> systemd, we can make ongoing future depoetterization easier, and very
> possibly give ourselves a better, easier to administer init.
>
If you're referring to this API [1], it doesn't look too bad. In most
cases, it
Steve Litt wrote
> Hi all,
>
> When Irrwahn mentioned that cups needed depoetterization, my first
> thought was "what in the world does cups need with systemd? And then I
> realized the problem.
>
> Like a lot of us, I'm on the supervis...@list.skarnet.org mailing list,
> where they
Hi all,
When Irrwahn mentioned that cups needed depoetterization, my first
thought was "what in the world does cups need with systemd? And then I
realized the problem.
Like a lot of us, I'm on the supervis...@list.skarnet.org mailing list,
where they discuss all things init, mainly from the persp
