On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 23:04:25 +0200
Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:36:23AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > A case in point is asciidoc. It's used to generate HTML pages and
> > books. To do books it recommends other sofftware that takes about
> > a
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:36:23AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> A case in point is asciidoc. It's used to generate HTML pages and
> books. To do books it recommends other sofftware that takes about a
> gigabyte on disk. Now the Docbook stuff and the LaTeX stuff are
> necessary for producing
On Mon, 01 Aug 2016 14:48:30 +0100
Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Daniel Reurich writes:
> > Why are we dragging up a thread from over a year ago??
> >
> > I strongly disagree, installing "Recommends" are IMHO reasonable
> > for the common case, and
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 07:38:07AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 01:55:57PM +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> > Why are we dragging up a thread from over a year ago??
> >
> > I strongly disagree, installing "Recommends" are IMHO reasonable for the
> > common case, and that
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 04:25:35PM +0200, Jaromil wrote:
[cut]
>
> What is feasible to do and comes out of this thread is to nurture the
> documentation about this setting and perhaps aim to add an option in
> Ascii about deactivating recommends: and suggests: . OTOH, inside
> derivatives like
On Mon, 01 Aug 2016, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Daniel Reurich writes:
> > Why are we dragging up a thread from over a year ago??
> >
> > I strongly disagree, installing "Recommends" are IMHO reasonable
> > for the common case, and that should stay the default except where
On 08/01/2016 01:55 AM, Daniel Reurich wrote:
>
> I think it may be useful to add a question into the installer about this
> (probably only in expert mode) rather than blindly change the current
> setting. Where we are rebuilding packages we could certainly review and
> potentially reclassify
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 01:55:57PM +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> Why are we dragging up a thread from over a year ago??
>
> I strongly disagree, installing "Recommends" are IMHO reasonable for the
> common case, and that should stay the default except where the user
> wants to maintain a really
Hi
Why are we dragging up a thread from over a year ago??
I strongly disagree, installing "Recommends" are IMHO reasonable for the
common case, and that should stay the default except where the user
wants to maintain a really minimal system, and is prepared to have to
install everything not an
Hi Nextime,
On 07/31/2016 02:00 PM, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI
wrote:
Franco Lanza wrote:
>Personally on debian i was using from date
>
>APT:Install-Recommends "0";
>APT:Install-Suggests "0";
>
>in all my install apt.conf.
>
>I don't like apt
On 07/31/2016 02:20 PM, Paweł Cholewiński wrote:
>
> First law of software quality picture from nixcraft ..
>
Oh, they even provided a line of examples :)
BTW, I thought this suggests/recommends set to false were already agreed
upon, so +1 here. (Sorry I didn't take the time to read the whole
W dniu 31.07.2016 o 13:47, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI pisze:
On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 00:36:22 +0200
Franco Lanza wrote:
Personally on debian i was using from date
APT:Install-Recommends "0";
APT:Install-Suggests "0";
in all my install apt.conf.
I don't like apt downloading and
On Fri, 3 Apr 2015 00:36:22 +0200
Franco Lanza wrote:
> Personally on debian i was using from date
>
> APT:Install-Recommends "0";
> APT:Install-Suggests "0";
>
> in all my install apt.conf.
>
> I don't like apt downloading and installing things that are not required
> but
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 07:43:26PM -0500, T.J. Duchene wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Franco Lanza [mailto:next...@nexlab.it]
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 5:36 PM
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: [Dng] What do you guys think about Suggest and Recommends
dependency
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 09:40:41PM -1000, Joel Roth wrote:
[cut]
Note that for a minimal dependencies default, the options to
apt-get are not ideal. We have these two options related to
the dependency graph.
--no-install-recommends
Do not consider recommended packages
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 08:18:29AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 12:36:22AM +0200, Franco Lanza wrote:
Personally on debian i was using from date
APT:Install-Recommends 0;
APT:Install-Suggests 0;
in all my install apt.conf.
I don't like apt downloading and
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 12:36:22AM +0200, Franco Lanza wrote:
Personally on debian i was using from date
APT:Install-Recommends 0;
APT:Install-Suggests 0;
in all my install apt.conf.
I don't like apt downloading and installing things that are not required
but just recommended or
On Fri 03 April 2015 21:40:41 Joel Roth wrote:
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 08:18:29AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 12:36:22AM +0200, Franco Lanza wrote:
Personally on debian i was using from date
APT:Install-Recommends 0;
APT:Install-Suggests 0;
in all my
On 04/04/15 09:40, Joel Roth wrote:
Note that for a minimal dependencies default, the options to
apt-get are not ideal. We have these two options related to
the dependency graph.
--no-install-recommends
Do not consider recommended packages as a dependency for installing.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:36 PM, Franco Lanza next...@nexlab.it wrote:
Personally on debian i was using from date
APT:Install-Recommends 0;
APT:Install-Suggests 0;
+1
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
On Fri, 4/3/15, Anto arya...@chello.at wrote:
Subject: Re: [Dng] What do you guys think about Suggest and Recommends
dependency?
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Date: Friday, April 3, 2015, 11:28 AM
On 03/04/15 01:53, hellekin wrote:
Oh, did I just announce the Devuan forum?
You did! And I just
On 03/04/15 00:36, Franco Lanza wrote:
Personally on debian i was using from date
APT:Install-Recommends 0;
APT:Install-Suggests 0;
in all my install apt.conf.
I don't like apt downloading and installing things that are not required
but just recommended or suggested, expecially in server or
I'm all for it. If there are a set of packages that usually get installed
together, we can create a metapackage for them.
-Jude
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Franco Lanza next...@nexlab.it wrote:
Personally on debian i was using from date
APT:Install-Recommends 0;
APT:Install-Suggests 0;
Personally on debian i was using from date
APT:Install-Recommends 0;
APT:Install-Suggests 0;
in all my install apt.conf.
I don't like apt downloading and installing things that are not required
but just recommended or suggested, expecially in server or embedded
envs, but also on my desktop.
-Original Message-
From: Franco Lanza [mailto:next...@nexlab.it]
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 5:36 PM
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: [Dng] What do you guys think about Suggest and Recommends
dependency?
Personally on debian i was using from date
APT:Install-Recommends 0
On 04/02/2015 07:36 PM, Franco Lanza wrote:
Personally on debian i was using from date
APT:Install-Recommends 0;
APT:Install-Suggests 0;
What do you think if we make this the default in devuan?
*** +1. I'm all for minimalism in Devuan, and encouraging people to use
Blends for extended
26 matches
Mail list logo