Am Donnerstag, den 30.04.2015, 23:58 +0100 schrieb Jaromil:
> after all, we really are a fork. we mean it.
*Me* applauds. And throwing away the outdated yet sane levels of
knowledge and wisdom has already proven to evocate disaster[1].
"Back then most things were better; and they were, of course,
On April 29, 2015 1:19:25 PM GMT+01:00, Hendrik Boom
wrote:
>On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:31:16AM +0200, Franco Lanza wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 05:16:42PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>> >
>> > acpid and acpi-support-base have already been removed from tasksel.
>>
>>
>> We already forked
lists.dyne.org
> Subject: Re: [Dng] acpi and systemd
>
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:31:16AM +0200, Franco Lanza wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 05:16:42PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > >
> > > acpid and acpi-support-base have already been removed from tasksel.
> &g
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:31:16AM +0200, Franco Lanza wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 05:16:42PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> >
> > acpid and acpi-support-base have already been removed from tasksel.
>
>
> We already forked tasksel, so, it should not be an issue for us as long
> as those two p
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 05:16:42PM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
> acpid and acpi-support-base have already been removed from tasksel.
We already forked tasksel, so, it should not be an issue for us as long
as those two packages are maintained, or we will need to fork both acpid
and acpi-support-
Debian is dropping acpi and acpi-support-base from the default install
because they conflict with systemd. They are dropping them even for
those installations that use sysv-init, because even those Debian
installations use the systemd login demon (which seems to take over the
jobs of acpi, for
