On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Klaus Hartnegg wrote:
> Nowhere on that page is a version number or a release date, so people not
> familar with cool have no idea how outdated this might be
So let's strive to make better documentation.
___
Dng mailing l
>>> Just want to say that I really like this idea of naming releases after
minor planets, such as Ceres. It's a way cool idea.
>> Cool yes, but useful? Numbers have the huge advantage that everybody
knows their order, which is quite important when referring to versions.
> Most people will want th
Am 07.03.2015 um 19:31 schrieb hellekin:
On 03/07/15 14:21, william moss wrote:
Cool yes, but useful? Numbers have the huge advantage that everybody knows
their order, which is quite important when referring to versions.
*** Release *NAMES* never replaced version numbers.
Hence Debian 8 "J
On 03/07/15 14:21, william moss wrote:
>
>> Cool yes, but useful? Numbers have the huge advantage that everybody knows
>> their order, which is quite important when referring to versions.
>
*** Release *NAMES* never replaced version numbers.
Hence Debian 8 "Jessie" and Devuan 1.0 "Jessie".
==
hk
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Klaus Hartnegg wrote:
>> Just want to say that I really like this idea of naming releases after minor
>> planets, such as Ceres. It's a way cool idea.
+1
> Cool yes, but useful? Numbers have the huge advantage that everybody knows
> their order, which is quite i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/07/2015 11:16 AM, Klaus Hartnegg wrote:
> Am 04.03.2015 um 23:10 schrieb Robert Storey :
>
>> Just want to say that I really like this idea of naming releases after minor
>> planets, such as Ceres. It's a way cool idea.
>
> Cool yes, but use
Am 04.03.2015 um 23:10 schrieb Robert Storey :
> Just want to say that I really like this idea of naming releases after minor
> planets, such as Ceres. It's a way cool idea.
Cool yes, but useful? Numbers have the huge advantage that everybody knows
their order, which is quite important when ref
Unless we are really intent on aping Debian and xBuntu, how about not using a
name at all, but only a number; maybe split in Major and Minor ?
Cheers,
Ron.
--
The right to be heard does not include
the right to be taken seriously.
On 06/03/15 16:07, Didier Kryn wrote:
Le 05/03/2015 02:36, Ricardo Larrañaga a écrit :
So, basically we will be using mithology for names. Ahead on the list
it gets a little more variety, but initially is mostly gods and godess
It could start with an offset, say Charon, the companion o
Le 05/03/2015 02:36, Ricardo Larrañaga a écrit :
So, basically we will be using mithology for names. Ahead on the list
it gets a little more variety, but initially is mostly gods and godess
It could start with an offset, say Charon, the companion of Pluto.
Not so fancy, but not a god a
On March 4, 2015 11:10:24 PM GMT+01:00, Robert Storey
wrote:
>Quite frankly, I always thought it was rather lame to name Debian
>releases
>after the toys in Toy Story. Then again, I thought the movie was lame
>too.
Yes!!! me too!!!
___
Dng maili
> This way it would be much easier to count which
> release it is, and it would serve as an indication that devuan has
> already it's own personality, and isn't only a debian's copy.
that is a poor rationale for breaking a logical naming scheme.
--Gravis
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:44 AM, P. T. Zol
2015-03-05 2:36 GMT+01:00, Ricardo Larrañaga :
> So, basically we will be using mithology for names. Ahead on the list it
> gets a little more variety, but initially is mostly gods and godess
Well, I think this is a good reminder. That even things people once
thought as all powerful, always end up
> Just want to say that I really like this idea of naming releases after minor
> planets, such as Ceres. It's a way cool idea. I nominate pseudo-planet Sedna
> for a future Devuan release. Not sure how many of these planets exist, but
> if we run out of planet names, there's always the many moons o
On 03/04/15 23:23, Gravis wrote:
>> So, basically we will be using mithology for names.
>
*** Although Homer was verbose on names, I doubt he ever reached
670,000. Once the astronomers depleted the stock of gods, semi-gods,
muses, spirits, heroes and so forth, they ventured into baptizing space
ob
> So, basically we will be using mithology for names.
1) spelling
2) basically, just series of letters but one might call that an
oversimplification. they are the names of minor planets.
--Gravis
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Ricardo Larrañaga
wrote:
> So, basically we will be using mitholog
So, basically we will be using mithology for names. Ahead on the list it
gets a little more variety, but initially is mostly gods and godess
On Mar 4, 2015 9:25 PM, "Gravis" wrote:
> > Not sure how many of these planets exist, but if we run out of planet
> names, there's always the many moons of
> Not sure how many of these planets exist, but if we run out of planet
names, there's always the many moons of the solar system (165 by last
count). And then there are the comets.
"Minor planets can be dwarf planets, asteroids, trojans, centaurs, Kuiper
belt objects, and other trans-Neptunian obj
Just want to say that I really like this idea of naming releases after
minor planets, such as Ceres. It's a way cool idea. I nominate
pseudo-planet Sedna for a future Devuan release. Not sure how many of these
planets exist, but if we run out of planet names, there's always the many
moons of the so
19 matches
Mail list logo
