On 25/11/17 11:10 PM, zap wrote:
The troublesome routers I would temporarily try a "factory reset" on
https://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Hard_reset_or_30/30/30
and set them up from scratch and attempt installation of the most
current firmware.
It you are having pop-up warnings I would take
The troublesome routers I would temporarily try a "factory reset" on
> https://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/Hard_reset_or_30/30/30
> and set them up from scratch and attempt installation of the most
> current firmware.
>
> It you are having pop-up warnings I would take a good look at your web
>
On 25/11/17 03:23 AM, leloft wrote:
I have learned more about deep-security issues from this list than
from all other sources combined. It is probably my most
important resource for informations of this kind: it makes me think in
ways that I would never have even considered, and is as far
> So could I ask for your opinions please?
> 1) What should I replace the Netgear router with?
> What's the 'critics choice'?
> 2) Which is less insecure: launching X
> through a display manager (which has root privileges and grants them
> to X), or from startx and Xwrapper
On 11/25/2017 03:23 AM, leloft wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:32:52 -0600
> goli...@dyne.org wrote:
>
>
> So could I ask for your opinions please?
> 1) What should I replace the Netgear router with?
> What's the 'critics choice'?
If you're a "networking guy" (or at least comfortable with
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 15:32:52 -0600
goli...@dyne.org wrote:
> On 2017-11-23 15:06, Rick Moen wrote:
> >
> > Seriously, guys, less bullshit on security matters, please. Some
> > of us can actually detect it and find it annoying.
> >
>
> What I'm finding annoying is that someone who has been
On 2017-11-23 15:06, Rick Moen wrote:
Seriously, guys, less bullshit on security matters, please. Some of us
can actually detect it and find it annoying.
What I'm finding annoying is that someone who has been moderated still
has a presence on this list via a reply to an off-list email.
Quoting Arnt Karlsen (a...@iaksess.no):
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:47:40 +0100, John wrote in message
> <02372660-5727-d160-fe49-e3a4963f8...@atlantech.com>:
>
> > On 23/11/17 12:28, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > > ..the kernel guys has this far proven more trustworthy, IME.
> >
> > Number of times
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 11:32:57 +0100, John wrote in message
<51f391b3-2c10-78b0-d1ce-39f56f8e0...@atlantech.com>:
> Replying directly because Jaromil has said I am not welcome.
..no problem, I'll cc the list. ;o)
> On 23/11/17 11:06, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>
> > ..which leaves in place that
On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:20:05 +0100, John wrote in message
<25c55d20-a650-5ec7-5943-f2224ba21...@atlantech.com>:
> On 22/11/17 17:35, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > ..to reiterate: Is there a way to decode and read those binary
> > systemd journal logs on classic POSIX/Unix etc forensic systems
> >
On 22/11/17 17:35, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..to reiterate: Is there a way to decode and read those binary
systemd journal logs on classic POSIX/Unix etc forensic systems
_not_ running systemd?
Of course.
Either install a tool that does it for you, i.e. journalctl, or write a
tool to do it using
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:58:10 +, Arnt wrote in message
<6ff3d9c1-e23c-4b0e-af51-5f8db1425...@gulbrandsen.priv.no>:
> Arnt Karlsen writes:
> > you appear to suggest that law enforcement wanting to read systemd
> > journal logs, _should_ depend on the mercy of systemd developers
> > not
Le 22/11/2017 à 16:46, Arnt Gulbrandsen a écrit :
Didier Kryn writes:
Well, postgress is a database manager. You have a choice of
several others; they must be able to deal with high fluxes of data.
None of them is a critical system component.
WTF? Postgres is a critical system component
Didier Kryn writes:
Well, postgress is a database manager. You have a choice of
several others; they must be able to deal with high fluxes of
data. None of them is a critical system component.
WTF? Postgres is a critical system component of every single server where
I've ever installed
Le 22/11/2017 à 13:58, Arnt Gulbrandsen a écrit :
If you really want to look at the details in postgres, you can take a
good guess at whether two rows were inserted at the same time or one
later than the other.
Well, postgress is a database manager. You have a choice of several
others;
On 2017-11-22 09:46 AM, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
Aldemir Akpinar writes:
No, I've actually asked an honest question.
In that case you'll get my honest answer. I've implemented several
file/network formats vaguely like that journal format, one of them has
likely been used by millions of
Aldemir Akpinar writes:
No, I've actually asked an honest question.
In that case you'll get my honest answer. I've implemented several
file/network formats vaguely like that journal format, one of them has
likely been used by millions of people.
In each case, the team decided to use a
On 22/11/17 15:08, Aldemir Akpinar wrote:
On 22 November 2017 at 17:03, John Hughes > wrote:
On 22/11/17 14:18, Aldemir Akpinar wrote:
Could you elaborate why are you comparing a relational database
system where its files must be
On 22/11/17 14:22, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
Aldemir Akpinar writes:
Could you elaborate why are you comparing a relational database
system where its files must be binary with a logging system where its
files doesn't need to binary?
You make it sound is if binary files were some sort of horror
On 22 November 2017 at 17:22, Arnt Gulbrandsen
wrote:
> Aldemir Akpinar writes:
>
>> Could you elaborate why are you comparing a relational database system
>> where its files must be binary with a logging system where its files
>> doesn't need to binary?
>>
>
> You make
Aldemir Akpinar writes:
Could you elaborate why are you comparing a relational database
system where its files must be binary with a logging system
where its files doesn't need to binary?
You make it sound is if binary files were some sort of horror that requires
special justification.
On 22 November 2017 at 17:03, John Hughes wrote:
> On 22/11/17 14:18, Aldemir Akpinar wrote:
>
>
> That's routine. Few readers read everything that can be read. For example,
>> look at postgres. Its binary file format reveals quite a bit more than you
>> can get using psql,
On 22/11/17 14:18, Aldemir Akpinar wrote:
That's routine. Few readers read everything that can be read. For
example, look at postgres. Its binary file format reveals quite a
bit more than you can get using psql, and by design: The writer
and binary format are intended for
> That's routine. Few readers read everything that can be read. For example,
> look at postgres. Its binary file format reveals quite a bit more than you
> can get using psql, and by design: The writer and binary format are
> intended for storing things quickly and reliably, and the reader for
>
Arnt Karlsen writes:
you appear to suggest that law enforcement wanting to read systemd
journal logs, _should_ depend on the mercy of systemd developers not
"filtering" away inconvenient evidence of e.g. systemd developer
wrongdoing from said law enforcement.
That's routine. Few readers read
25 matches
Mail list logo