Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?

2020-10-11 Thread g4sra via Dng
On 11/10/2020 02:52, Simon Walter wrote: --snip-- > I use Qemu/KVM for Windows development. I currently use Qemu/KVM for customising\slipstreaming Windows installation image, everything else Windows related I do in a VM is just playing. Ever taken a look at ReactOS ? > What is your use case for

Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?

2020-10-10 Thread Simon Walter
On 2020-10-11 08:10, g4sra via Dng wrote: > On 10/10/2020 21:47, Simon Walter wrote: >> On 2020-10-08 21:08, g4sra via Dng wrote: >> -- snip -- >>> >>> Anybody enlighten me about the meaning of the phrase... >>> >>> 'The controller seems to be unused by "cgfsng" cgroup driver or not enabled >>>

Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?

2020-10-10 Thread g4sra via Dng
On 10/10/2020 21:47, Simon Walter wrote: > On 2020-10-08 21:08, g4sra via Dng wrote: >-- snip -- >> >> Anybody enlighten me about the meaning of the phrase... >> >> 'The controller seems to be unused by "cgfsng" cgroup driver or not enabled >> on the cgroup hierarchy' > > Sorry for the late

Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?

2020-10-10 Thread Simon Walter
On 2020-10-08 21:08, g4sra via Dng wrote: > On 08/10/2020 04:30, Simon Walter wrote: >> On 2020-10-05 11:23, tom wrote: >> ... >>> >>> I would appreciate if we kept this on-board unless needed. Never know >>> when someone in the future might find it useful. >>> >> >> I would appreciate that too!

Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?

2020-10-08 Thread g4sra via Dng
On 08/10/2020 04:30, Simon Walter wrote: > On 2020-10-05 11:23, tom wrote: > ... >> >> I would appreciate if we kept this on-board unless needed. Never know >> when someone in the future might find it useful. >> > > I would appreciate that too! > Current issue.. loop device not accessible...

Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?

2020-10-07 Thread Simon Walter
On 2020-10-05 11:23, tom wrote: ... > > I would appreciate if we kept this on-board unless needed. Never know > when someone in the future might find it useful. > I would appreciate that too! I use it mainly on servers, but also some dev env. I used the LXC and Debian documentation to get

Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?

2020-10-06 Thread g4sra via Dng
>> Can I put attachments on emails to the dyne mailing lists? > No idea, so I attached one to see what would happen... The attachment showed up, you might as well run it and post the output (on the list or direct, whichever you prefer) to give me a starting reference.

Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?

2020-10-06 Thread g4sra via Dng
On 06/10/2020 04:36, tom wrote: > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 11:30:10 +0100 > g4sra via Dng wrote: --snip-- > > Unprivileged containers I still have not figured out how to generate. If you would like I may be able to give guidance on generating them in Devuan. You would have to translate that into

Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?

2020-10-05 Thread tom
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 11:30:10 +0100 g4sra via Dng wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > This is my current thinking with regard to a LXC Container system for > building OS images and support software. The host workstation has all > the standard development tools ('build-essential' etc) that any/all > containers

Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?

2020-10-05 Thread tom
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 12:22:27 -0400 Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 11:04:23AM +0100, g4sra via Dng wrote: > > I am seeking any Devuaners with an interest in lxc to bounce ideas > > off. > > > > I wish to move to multi-fully-containerised development but am > > repeatedly stumbling

Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?

2020-10-05 Thread g4sra via Dng
On 05/10/2020 16:50, g4sra via Dng wrote: > Hi Tom, Mason, Anybody else... > > Beowulf lxc 1:3.1.0+really3.0.3-8 amd64 is broken. > > Simple test I picked up from the internet: > > ~# lxc-usernsexec > Failed to find subuid or subgid allocation --snip-- > > Considering what steps to take

Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?

2020-10-05 Thread g4sra via Dng
On 05/10/2020 17:22, Hendrik Boom wrote: --snip-- > > No practical experience. > But is there any chance lxc can play nicely with random USB devices? Or > the built-in camera and microphone? Never tried, not got that far. Importing (is that the correct jargon?) a device into a LXC Container

Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?

2020-10-05 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 11:04:23AM +0100, g4sra via Dng wrote: > I am seeking any Devuaners with an interest in lxc to bounce ideas off. > > I wish to move to multi-fully-containerised development but am repeatedly > stumbling along the way. > Unfortunately the official lxc resources do not help

Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?

2020-10-05 Thread g4sra via Dng
Hi Tom, Mason, Anybody else... Beowulf lxc 1:3.1.0+really3.0.3-8 amd64 is broken. Simple test I picked up from the internet: ~# lxc-usernsexec Failed to find subuid or subgid allocation On a host configured for unprivileged containers it should drop you into unprivileged 'root' mode:

Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?

2020-10-05 Thread g4sra via Dng
On 05/10/2020 03:23, tom wrote: > On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 11:04:23 +0100 > g4sra via Dng wrote: > >> I am seeking any Devuaners with an interest in lxc to bounce ideas >> off. -- snip -- > > Hello grsra, I run LXC on Devuan, and have done so even through the > ascii->beowulf migration. I have some

Re: [DNG] Any parties interested in lxc ?

2020-10-04 Thread tom
On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 11:04:23 +0100 g4sra via Dng wrote: > I am seeking any Devuaners with an interest in lxc to bounce ideas > off. > > I wish to move to multi-fully-containerised development but am > repeatedly stumbling along the way. Unfortunately the official lxc > resources do not help much