On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 03:39:41PM +0100, Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> Now I compiled the latest version from git with symbols and did a backtrace
> under gdb:
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0xaa5c5a00 in ?? ()
> (gdb) backtrace
[cut]
It would be good to file the bug to
Now I compiled the latest version from git with symbols and did a
backtrace under gdb:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xaa5c5a00 in ?? ()
(gdb) backtrace
#0 0xaa5c5a00 in ?? ()
#1 0xfffb in ?? ()
#2 0xae3d99c0 in ?? ()
#3 0xaa5c59eb in ?? ()
#4 0xabc51f1c in ?? ()
Am 18.03.2017 um 23:41 schrieb Steve Litt:
> 64 bit, and it's Surf 0.7.
That confirms my theory that only 32 bit systems are affected.
Do you have a 32 bit system at hand and can proove that?
--
Mit besten Grüßen
Joachim Fahrner
___
Dng mailing
On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 20:05:57 +0100
Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> Am 2017-03-18 18:18, schrieb Steve Litt:
> > I was hoping I could reproduce your problem. My Surf is no angel, it
> > sometimes hangs and sometimes vanishes, but it pulled up that
> > website perfectly.
>
> Hi
Am 2017-03-18 18:18, schrieb Steve Litt:
I was hoping I could reproduce your problem. My Surf is no angel, it
sometimes hangs and sometimes vanishes, but it pulled up that website
perfectly.
Hi Steve,
is your system 32-bit or 64-bit? I think the issue is 32-bit related.
Jochen
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 01:23:49PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 07:47:37 -0400
>
> You can rule out plugins completely by running it with:
>
> surf -p
Still fails:
hendrik@notlookedfor:~$ surf -p http://www.dhl.de
(surf:26064): Gdk-CRITICAL **: gdk_window_set_events:
On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 07:47:37 -0400
Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 07:45:49AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:36:11AM +0100, Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> > > Am 18.03.2017 um 10:32 schrieb KatolaZ:
> > > >
> > > > it loads fine over
On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 07:54:17 +0100
Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> Please can someone try to load http://www.dhl.de with surf?
> I get a segmentation fault when opening this page.
> That happens woth both, the version from stable and the version from
> backports.
>
> Regards
>
Am 18.03.2017 um 13:01 schrieb Ralph Ronnquist:
> Maybe. It works for me on amd64, and seg-faults on i386. It's surf
> version 0.6; the standard apt-get gotten package for both.
> Devuan Jessie beta2.
>
> gdb (without symbols) points at an attempted call to 0xfffb
Looks like some data type
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:50:18AM +, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 07:47:37AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> >
> > I have not installed plugins for surf. But could it be finding
> > plugins installed for other browsers?
> >
>
> From the surf manpage:
>
> For
Maybe. It works for me on amd64, and seg-faults on i386. It's surf
version 0.6; the standard apt-get gotten package for both.
Devuan Jessie beta2.
gdb (without symbols) points at an attempted call to 0xfffb
Ralph.
Joachim Fahrner wrote on 2017-03-18 21:36:
Am 18.03.2017 um 10:32 schrieb
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 07:47:37AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
[cut]
>
> I have not installed plugins for surf. But could it be finding
> plugins installed for other browsers?
>
From the surf manpage:
For using plugins in surf, first determine your running
architecture. Then get the
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 07:45:49AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:36:11AM +0100, Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> > Am 18.03.2017 um 10:32 schrieb KatolaZ:
> > >
> > > it loads fine over here.
> > >
> > > $ surf -v
> > > surf-0.7, ©2009-2015 surf engineers, see LICENSE for details
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:36:11AM +0100, Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> Am 18.03.2017 um 10:32 schrieb KatolaZ:
> >
> > it loads fine over here.
> >
> > $ surf -v
> > surf-0.7, ©2009-2015 surf engineers, see LICENSE for details
> >
> > HND
> >
> > KatolaZ
> >
> >
>
> ok, I tried it on some other pc
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 07:54:17AM +0100, Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> Please can someone try to load http://www.dhl.de with surf?
> I get a segmentation fault when opening this page.
> That happens woth both, the version from stable and the version from
> backports.
hendrik@notlookedfor:~$ surf
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:36:11AM +0100, Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> Am 18.03.2017 um 10:32 schrieb KatolaZ:
> >
> > it loads fine over here.
> >
> > $ surf -v
> > surf-0.7, ©2009-2015 surf engineers, see LICENSE for details
> >
> > HND
> >
> > KatolaZ
> >
> >
>
> ok, I tried it on some other pc
Am 18.03.2017 um 10:32 schrieb KatolaZ:
>
> it loads fine over here.
>
> $ surf -v
> surf-0.7, ©2009-2015 surf engineers, see LICENSE for details
>
> HND
>
> KatolaZ
>
>
ok, I tried it on some other pc (amd64), there it works without
segmentation fault. Maybe it's an issue with i386?
--
Mit
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 07:54:17AM +0100, Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> Please can someone try to load http://www.dhl.de with surf?
> I get a segmentation fault when opening this page.
> That happens woth both, the version from stable and the version from
> backports.
>
Hi,
it loads fine over here.
On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 19:36:50 +1100, Ralph wrote in message
:
> The page loads "fine" for me. Same surf version. There's some few and
> probably irrelevant log lines in the terminal, but no seg-fault.
>
> Ralph.
..put them online somewhere and
The page loads "fine" for me. Same surf version. There's some few and
probably irrelevant log lines in the terminal, but no seg-fault.
Ralph.
Robert Nilsson wrote on 2017-03-18 18:12:
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 07:54:17AM +0100, Joachim Fahrner wrote:
Please can someone try to load
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 07:54:17AM +0100, Joachim Fahrner wrote:
> Please can someone try to load http://www.dhl.de with surf?
> I get a segmentation fault when opening this page.
> That happens woth both, the version from stable and the version from
> backports.
>
> Regards
> Jochen
>
>
21 matches
Mail list logo