On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:33:28AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
[cut]
If I recall correctly, so far *every* Linux I've used uses an external
DNS by default instead of installing its own recursor.
I figure there must be a reason, but I don't know what it is.
That's wrong, AFAIK. If you
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 08:27:00AM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 10:33:28AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
[cut]
If I recall correctly, so far *every* Linux I've used uses an external
DNS by default instead of installing its own recursor.
I figure there must be a
On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 07:32:14AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote:
[cut]
OK. Maybe I misspoke. The installer would ask me to choose an
external DNS. It would not take the initiative of offering me to
install my own on my own machine.
Of course II always did have the option of tracking
Le 03/04/2015 11:10, marc...@welz.org.za a écrit :
Could it be we have some sort of Stockholm Syndrome where people
whose data is captured at google start emphasising with the captor ?
Or maybe we dimly remember that somewhere they use Linux and claimed
that they weren't doing evil,
Am Freitag, 3. April 2015, 10:35:45 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
That said, the fallback DNS is only used if no other DNS is configured.
Which IMHO is quite unusually.
I think not even then, cause I think systemd-resolved is not used, unless
activated and configured to be used in nsswitch.conf
Where i come from ISP's dynamic IP lease times are *very* long, you
need to reboot the home router to get a new IP and even then you may
get the same IP. It's not that dynamic, at all. Add that with data
your browser provides, your *.google.com in|direct usage, etc... it's
easy to
In my case I prefer OpenWRT which uses dnsmasq to handle the task of LAN
IP assignments and name resolution.
- Nate
--
The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true.
Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://www.n0nb.us
On Fri 03 April 2015 22:55:58 marc wrote:
I believe some distributions already use things like dnsmasq
to do simpler caching
Maemo (N900) using dnsmasq http://maemo.org/packages/view/dnsmasq/
and even my more ancient wrt54g 2nd level router with Firmware: DD-WRT v24-
sp2 (07/22/09) mini offers
If I recall correctly, so far *every* Linux I've used uses an external
DNS by default instead of installing its own recursor.
I figure there must be a reason, but I don't know what it is.
So a cache becomes more efficient if several machines use it -
especially given the
Hi Marc,
P2P dns springs to mind. But it seems to have no recent development...
https://github.com/Mononofu/P2P-DNS
http://sourceforge.net/projects/p2pdns/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/qtdnsp2p/
http://qtdnsp2p.sourceforge.net/
You could also have a look at MaidSafe, for P2P cloud storage
-Original Message-
From: Martin Steigerwald [mailto:mar...@lichtvoll.de]
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 3:36 AM
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: [Dng] Another reason of why I am considering Devuan
Please do not Cc me personally on your reply.
[T.J. ] Apologies. Reply to all
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 02:52:46PM -0500, T.J. Duchene wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adam Borowski [mailto:kilob...@angband.pl]
Then why not set up a recursor by default? Benefits include:
* avoiding this privacy issue
* caching
* secure DNSSEC (no last mile issues)
On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 09:40:09PM +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:52 PM, T.J. Duchene t.j.duch...@gmail.com wrote:
DNS calls are nonspecific
data, associated only with your carrier's dynamic IP address, not a specific
user.
Where i come from ISP's dynamic IP lease
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 8:52 PM, T.J. Duchene t.j.duch...@gmail.com wrote:
DNS calls are nonspecific
data, associated only with your carrier's dynamic IP address, not a specific
user.
Where i come from ISP's dynamic IP lease times are *very* long, you
need to reboot the home router to get a new
-Original Message-
From: Adam Borowski [mailto:kilob...@angband.pl]
Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 9:41 PM
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: [Dng] Another reason of why I am considering Devuan
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 08:38:07PM -0500, T.J. Duchene wrote:
[T.J. ] To be honest
Where i come from ISP's dynamic IP lease times are *very* long, you need to
reboot the home router to get a new IP and even then you may get the
same IP. It's not that dynamic, at all. Add that with data your browser
provides, your *.google.com in|direct usage, etc... it's easy to correlate
On Thu 02 April 2015 20:30:23 T.J. Duchene wrote:
Where i come from ISP's dynamic IP lease times are *very* long, you need
to
reboot the home router to get a new IP and even then you may get the
same IP. It's not that dynamic, at all. Add that with data your browser
provides, your
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 08:38:07PM -0500, T.J. Duchene wrote:
[T.J. ] To be honest, I do not quite get what the debate is over at Debian.
That's something of a big *shrug* as far as I am concerned. Falling back on
Google's nameserver is no better or worse than using anyone else's.
Most
Bug#761658: Please do not default to using Google nameservers
Marco tagged it as wontfix. Seriously, if I didn´t configure a
nameserver I *mean* it. I don´t want it to just choose a Google
nameserver then, without even telling me.
[T.J. ] To be honest, I do not quite get what the
dear Martin,
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Bug#761658: Please do not default to using Google nameservers
tl;dr - isn't there a preseed directive to change the default?!
Marco tagged it as wontfix. Seriously, if I didn´t configure a
nameserver I *mean* it. I don´t want it
20 matches
Mail list logo
