On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:24 AM, T.J. Duchene t.j.duch...@gmail.com wrote:
What I said was at some point Devuan will probably have to support systemd's
API, in order to support upstream projects that actually require systemd.
Why?
Biggest example: GNOME (now) requires systemd. I don't want
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Jude Nelson - jud...@gmail.com
devuan.kn.ae5676beef.judecn#gmail@ob.0sg.net wrote:
The only way not to be forcing anybody is to stick with the least
common denominator for everything. That flat out stops progress.
This is simply not true. A key hallmark of
Hey Steve!
Do you understand what mailing list this is?
Yes. I do. I didn't start the discussion. I actually recommended
tabling it until after Devuan is released.
Why in the *world* would we go to the substantial trouble of
depoetterizing Debian if we wanted systemd to sneak back in via some
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015, Peter Olson wrote:
On March 21, 2015 at 6:36 PM Robert Storey robert.sto...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hopefully, it's just a rumor, though it sounds real.
Indeed, I've been wondering why RMS hasn't commented on systemd long
ago when it became obvious that it would
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:34 AM, Joerg Reisenweber -
reisenwe...@web.de
devuan.kn.d76efe93d7.reisenweber#web...@ob.0sg.net wrote:
From
*root fs: any you like, even MSDOS (with some limitations) *
to an undiscussed unsolicited
*root fs: btrfs mandatory*
is *not* the kind of progress I want to
On Sun 22 March 2015 11:29:54 devuan...@spamgourmet.net wrote:
Considering that the blog post is all about putting an idea up for
discussion I really do not see how that can be undiscussed and
unsolicited. How should you get a discussion started on the internet?
Considering how I clearly
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:53:02 +
Nuno Magalhães nunomagalh...@eu.ipp.pt wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:24 AM, T.J. Duchene t.j.duch...@gmail.com
wrote:
What I said was at some point Devuan will probably have to support
systemd's API, in order to support upstream projects that actually
I think everyone is in agreement that they fulfill the letter of the
license. The spirit may be lacking especially in regards to access.
Being an enormous, interdependent hairball simply puts the code out of
reach for all practical purposes as well as restricting use. Again,
that's spirit
Sorry about that bad Subject line, gentlemen. I used Gmail's web interface
last night and it totally screwed things up.
@Steve Litt, Numo, and Patrick:
Frankly everyone, without trying to be rude here - that is your prerogative
whether you like or hate Gnome, systemd or whatever. I
Le 22/03/2015 16:59, Steve Litt a écrit :
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:53:02 +
Nuno Magalhãesnunomagalh...@eu.ipp.pt wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 7:24 AM, T.J. Duchenet.j.duch...@gmail.com
wrote:
What I said was at some point Devuan will probably have to support
systemd's API, in order to
From: T.J. Duchene [mailto:t.j.duch...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 2:25 AM
To: dng@lists.dyne.org
Subject: Re: Dng Digest, Vol 6, Issue 75
Hey Steve!
Do you understand what mailing list this is?
Yes. I do. I didn't start the discussion. I actually recommended tabling it
Would it be possible to avoid offensive characterization of people who
do not think along the same lines?
Would it be possible to avoid gender-biased characterization of people
who are participating in this list?
Thank you
==
hk
___
Dng mailing list
On March 22, 2015 at 6:29 AM Jaromil jaro...@dyne.org wrote:
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015, Peter Olson wrote:
RMS didn't call me a troll, he answered the question. Somebody else
took it upon himself to refer to the question as trolling. I haven't
decided yet whether to speak to that person
13 matches
Mail list logo
