Hi Antony, list,
Antony Stone writes:
> On Saturday 30 July 2022 at 12:07:53, Steve Litt wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 14:27 +0200, tito via Dng wrote:
>> > https://linuxiac.com/best-systemd-free-linux-distributions/
>> >
>> > I think the author knows nothing about devuan and spreads FUD
>>
On 2022-07-31 09:14, tito via Dng wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 13:29:18 +0100
Peter Duffy wrote:
Is it worth while considering putting a link to the article on
devuan.org, together with a response answering the criticisms in
detail?
I think yes and to the comments section of the article.
On Sat, 2022-07-30 at 06:07 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 14:27 +0200, tito via Dng wrote:
> > https://linuxiac.com/best-systemd-free-linux-distributions/
> >
> > I think the author knows nothing about devuan and spreads FUD
> >
>
> I thought most of the Devuan review was
On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 7:29 AM Peter Duffy wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2022-07-30 at 06:07 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 14:27 +0200, tito via Dng wrote:
> > > https://linuxiac.com/best-systemd-free-linux-distributions/
> > >
> > > I think the author knows nothing about devuan and
On 2022-07-31 07:29, Peter Duffy wrote:
Is it worth while considering putting a link to the article on
devuan.org, together with a response answering the criticisms in
detail?
devuan.org is not a social news service for trivia. If any Devuan
articles were to be posted, it should be these:
On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 13:29:18 +0100
Peter Duffy wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-07-30 at 06:07 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 14:27 +0200, tito via Dng wrote:
> > > https://linuxiac.com/best-systemd-free-linux-distributions/
> > >
> > > I think the author knows nothing about devuan and
